WOS

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/932

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.Meta-analysis

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Biological variation data for lipid cardiovascular risk assessment biomarkers. A systematic review applying the biological variation data critical appraisal checklist (BIVAC)
    (ELSEVIER, 2019-01-01) Diaz-Garzon, Jorge; Fernandez Calle, Pilar; Minchinela, Joana; Aarsand, Aasne K.; Bartlett, William A.; Aslan, Berna; Boned, Beatriz; Braga, Federica; Carobene, Anna; Coskun, Abdurrahman; Gonzalez-Lao, Elisabet; Jonker, Niels; Marques-Garcia, Fernando; Perich, Carmen; Ricos, Carmen; Simon, Margarita; Sandberg, Sverre
    Background: Biological variation (BV) data can be used to set analytical performance specifications (APS) for lipid assays. Poor performance will impact upon the efficacy of international guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment (CVR) and relevant clinical decision limits. This systematic review applies the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC) to published studies of BV of CVR biomarkers enabling metanalysis of the data. Methods: Studies of BV of total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoproteins A(1) and B, retrieved using a systematic literature search, were evaluated and graded using the BIVAC. Meta analysis of CV1 and CVG estimates were performed utilizing weightings based upon BIVAC grades and the width of the data confidence intervals. Results: Applying the BIVAC, ten publications were graded as D, 43 as C, 5 as B and 1 as A (fully compliant). A total of 196 CV1 and 87 CVG estimates were available for the different lipid measurands. The meta-analysis-derived BV data estimates were generally concordant with those in the online 2014 BV database. Conclusions: Application of BIVAC identifies BV data suitable for many important applications including setting APS. Additionally, this review identifies a need for new BIVAC compliant studies to deliver BV reference data in different subpopulations.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    High efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in patients with comorbid migraine and depression: a meta-analysis
    (BMC, 2021-01-01) Affatato, Oreste; Moulin, Thiago C.; Pisanu, Claudia; Babasieva, Victoria S.; Russo, Marco; Aydinlar, Elif I.; Torelli, Paola; Chubarev, Vladimir N.; Tarasov, Vadim V.; Schioeth, Helgi B.; Mwinyi, Jessica
    Background: Migraine and depression are highly prevalent and partly overlapping disorders that cause strong limitations in daily life. Patients tend to respond poorly to the therapies available for these diseases. OnabotulinumtoxinA has been proven to be an effective treatment for both migraine and depression. While many studies have addressed the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA in migraine or depression separately, a growing body of evidence suggests beneficial effects also for patients comorbid with migraine and depression. The current meta-analysis systematically investigates to what extent onabotulinumtoxinA is efficient in migraineurs with depression. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed based on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from the earliest date till October 30th, 2020. Mean, standard deviation (SD) and sample size have been used to evaluate improvement in depressive symptoms and migraine using random- effects empirical Bayes model. Results: Our search retrieved 259 studies, eight of which met the inclusion criteria. OnabotulinumtoxinA injections administered to patients with both chronic migraine and major depressive disorder led to mean reduction of - 8.94 points (CI {[} - 10.04,- 7.84], p < 0.01) in the BDI scale, of - 5.90 points (CI {[} - 9.92,- 1.88], p < 0.01) in the BDI-II scale and of - 6.19 points (CI {[} - 9.52,- 2.86], p < 0.01) in the PHQ-9 scale, when evaluating depressive symptoms. In the case of the migraine-related symptoms, we found mean reductions of - 4.10 (CI {[} - 7.31,- 0.89], p = 0.01) points in the HIT6 scale, - 32.05 (CI {[} - 55.96,- 8.14], p = 0.01) in the MIDAS scale, - 1.7 (CI {[} - 3.27,- 0.13], p = 0.03) points in the VAS scale and of - 6.27 (CI {[} - 8.48,- 4.07], p < 0.01) migraine episodes per month. Comorbid patients showed slightly better improvements in BDI, HIT6 scores and migraine frequency compared to monomorbid patients. The latter group manifested better results in MIDAS and VAS scores. Conclusion: Treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA leads to a significant reduction of disease severity of both chronic migraine and major depressive disorder in patients comorbid with both diseases. Comparative analyses suggest an equivalent strong effect in monomorbid and comorbid patients, with beneficial effects specifically seen for certain migraine features.