<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Multiregional Rehabilitation Targeting the Cervical and Temporomandibular Regions in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

dc.contributor.authorDelceoglu, Seyma
dc.contributor.authorSafran, Elif Esma
dc.contributor.authorSevgin, Omer
dc.contributor.authorSafran, Ertugrul
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:07:02Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground and Purpose Non-specific chronic neck pain (NSCNP) is highly prevalent and frequently associated with temporomandibular-related impairments, yet rehabilitation programs commonly focus on a single anatomical region. Given the functional and biomechanical interconnections between the cervical spine and temporomandibular region, this study aimed to compare the short-term effects of a cervical-focused rehabilitation program with an integrated cervical-temporomandibular rehabilitation approach in individuals with NSCNP.Methods In this single-blind, randomized controlled trial, 42 adults with NSCNP were allocated to receive either cervical rehabilitation alone (45 min/session) or an integrated cervical-temporomandibular rehabilitation program (60 min/session), delivered five sessions per week for 4 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (VAS) and neck-related disability (NDI). Secondary outcomes included posture, cervical range of motion, muscle endurance, and sleep quality. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and immediately post-intervention.Results Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and disability following the intervention period (p < 0.001). Between-group analyses showed greater short-term reductions in pain intensity and neck-related disability in the integrated rehabilitation group compared with cervical rehabilitation alone, with large effect sizes. More pronounced improvements were also observed across several secondary outcomes, including posture, cervical mobility, muscle endurance, and sleep quality. No adverse events were reported.Discussion An integrated cervical-temporomandibular rehabilitation approach was associated with greater short-term clinical improvements under a higher overall treatment dose than cervical-focused rehabilitation alone in individuals with NSCNP. These findings suggest the potential clinical value of a multiregional treatment perspective; however, they should be interpreted with caution because the Cervical + TMJ group received a higher overall treatment dose, which precludes definitive attribution of the observed effects specifically to the temporomandibular-directed components. Additionally, the findings are limited to immediate post-intervention outcomes.Trial Registration This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID: NCT06005922
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.pagese70216
dc.description.volume31
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pri.70216
dc.identifier.issn1358-2267
dc.identifier.issn1471-2865
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70216
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11411
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001736161800001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.hasversion10.1002/pri.70216
dc.relation.ispartofPHYSIOTHERAPY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
dc.subjectarticular
dc.subjectneck pain
dc.subjectrange of motion
dc.subjectrehabilitation
dc.subjecttemporomandibular joint disorders
dc.subjectDISABILITY INDEX
dc.subjectRELIABILITY
dc.subjectDISORDERS
dc.subjectVALIDITY
dc.subjectSENSITIVITY
dc.subjectENDURANCE
dc.titleMultiregional Rehabilitation Targeting the Cervical and Temporomandibular Regions in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.volume31
person.identifier.ridJQX-2119-2023
person.identifier.ridRCX-3823-2026
person.identifier.ridAEE-9380-2022

Files

Collections