<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Glittre ADL test in patients with atrial fibrillation

dc.contributor.authorAlkan, Onurkan
dc.contributor.authorOzcan Kahraman, Buse
dc.contributor.authorTanriverdi Eyolcu, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorYilancioglu, Resit Yigit
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Oguzhan Ekrem
dc.contributor.authorOzcan, Emin Evren
dc.contributor.authorSavci, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:00:22Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground Activities of daily living (ADL) are frequently impaired in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is widely used for functional assessment, it primarily evaluates walking endurance and may not fully reflect complex ADL involving upper limb activities and postural changes. This study investigated the validity, reliability and clinical utility of the Glittre ADL test in AF. Methods This cross-sectional study included 39 AF patients and 39 matched healthy controls. All participants completed the Glittre ADL test. Concurrent validity was assessed using the 6MWT. Construct validity was evaluated using peripheral muscle strength, the five-times sit-to-stand test (5STS), Short Form-36, Atrial Fibrillation Impact Questionnaire and Milliken ADL Scale. Test-retest reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) by repeating the test after 1 hour. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the ability of the Glittre ADL test to discriminate individuals with increased symptom burden based on 6MWT performance; the optimal cut-off was determined using the Youden index. Results AF patients completed the Glittre ADL test significantly slower than healthy controls (198.98 s vs 180.09 s, p<0.05). Test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC=0.914; 95% CI 0.834 to 0.955). Test duration showed a strong negative correlation with 6MWT distance (r=-0.87, p<0.001) and significant correlations with 5STS performance, peripheral muscle strength and physical quality-of-life components (p<0.05). ROC analysis indicated high discriminative ability area under the curve=0.967; 95% CI 0.922 to 1.000), with an optimal cut-off of 196.52 s (sensitivity 100%, specificity 82.6%). Conclusions The Glittre ADL test is valid, reliable and clinically useful for assessing complex ADLs in AF patients. The defined cut-off helps clinicians identify functional impairment.
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.pagese004213
dc.description.volume13
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/openhrt-2026-004213
dc.identifier.issn2053-3624
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2026-004213
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10408
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001835175900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
dc.relation.hasversion10.1136/openhrt-2026-004213
dc.relation.ispartofOPEN HEART
dc.subjectAtrial Fibrillation
dc.subjectCARDIAC REHABILITATION
dc.subjectArrhythmias, Cardiac
dc.subjectSTRENGTH
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectCardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
dc.subjectCardiovascular System & Cardiology
dc.titleValidity, reliability and clinical utility of the Glittre ADL test in patients with atrial fibrillation
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.volume13
person.identifier.orcid0009-0004-5117-2352
person.identifier.ridQJV-3870-2026
person.identifier.ridGSJ-1019-2022
person.identifier.ridJAC-7345-2023
person.identifier.ridAAV-8016-2021

Files

Collections