<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Does suture number matter in transvaginal cervical cerclage? A propensity score-weighted cohort study

dc.contributor.authorKahraman, Edis
dc.contributor.authorKoroglu, Nadiye
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Turgut
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Mehmet Aytac
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:07:42Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo evaluate whether the number of sutures used during transvaginal cervical cerclage influences obstetric and neonatal outcomes when surgical technique, suture material, and perioperative management are standardized.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 125 women who underwent transvaginal cervical cerclage using identical monofilament suture material. Cerclage was performed with either a single suture (n = 23) or a double suture (n = 102) in this non-randomized observational cohort. The primary outcome was term delivery (>= 37 weeks' gestation). Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery and selected neonatal outcomes. To address non-random allocation and baseline group imbalance, propensity scores were estimated using pre-treatment maternal, obstetric, and clinical severity variables. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with truncation was applied, and doubly robust outcome models were used to estimate adjusted associations. Neonatal outcomes were analyzed at the pregnancy level to account for clustering in twin gestations.ResultsWomen receiving double-suture cerclage presented at earlier gestational ages and with greater markers of cervical severity at baseline; however, after IPTW and doubly robust adjustment accounting for these baseline differences, no statistically significant difference in term delivery was observed. Secondary obstetric outcomes, including gestational age at delivery, were also comparable between groups after adjustment. Pregnancy-level neonatal outcomes, including NICU admission and neonatal mortality, did not differ meaningfully by suture number. Sensitivity analysis restricted to singleton pregnancies and stratified by cerclage indication yielded consistent results.ConclusionAfter accounting for baseline cervical severity and clinical indication, single- and double-suture transvaginal cerclage was associated with comparable obstetric and neonatal outcomes under standardized surgical conditions. These findings suggest that cervical status at the time of cerclage placement, rather than the number of sutures applied, is the primary determinant of outcome.
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.pages190
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUB & Idot;TAK).
dc.description.volume313
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00404-026-08444-w
dc.identifier.issn0932-0067
dc.identifier.issn1432-0711
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-026-08444-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11475
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001755313900003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER HEIDELBERG
dc.relation.fundingAcibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University
dc.relation.hasversion10.1007/s00404-026-08444-w
dc.relation.ispartofARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS
dc.subjectCervical insufficiency
dc.subjectEmergency cerclage
dc.subjectProphylactic cerclage
dc.subjectPreterm birth
dc.subjectMcDonald technique
dc.subjectWurm technique
dc.subjectPREGNANCY OUTCOMES
dc.subjectINSUFFICIENCY
dc.subjectPREDICTOR
dc.subjectLENGTH
dc.subjectObstetrics & Gynecology
dc.titleDoes suture number matter in transvaginal cervical cerclage? A propensity score-weighted cohort study
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume313
person.identifier.ridNFT-1869-2025

Files

Collections