<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Dominant and Nondominant Side Patterns in Hamstring Stiffness and Clinical Flexibility in Amateur Football Players and Healthy Controls

dc.contributor.authorMercan, Numan
dc.contributor.authorElmali, Nurzat
dc.contributor.authorCitil, Serdal
dc.contributor.authorBilsel, Kerem
dc.contributor.authorTuncay, Ibrahim
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:00:16Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurpose Football-specific loading may be associated with different dominant and nondominant (D and ND) side patterns in hamstring stiffness and clinical flexibility. This study compared D and ND side patterns in semitendinosus (ST), semimembranosus (SM), and biceps femoris (BF) stiffness and in active knee extension (AKE) and straight leg raise (SLR) measurements between amateur football players and healthy controls.Methods This cross-sectional study included 50 amateur football players and 50 healthy controls without organized athletic participation. Bilateral ST, SM, and BF stiffness values were measured using shear wave elastography (SWE). Clinical hamstring flexibility was assessed with AKE and SLR tests. D and ND side differences were examined within each group, and side difference patterns were compared between groups.Results In football players, SM stiffness was higher on the dominant side (D-ND estimate, 1.25 kPa, p = 0.012). In controls, BF stiffness was higher on the nondominant side (D-ND estimate, - 0.90 kPa, p = 0.044). In the primary between group comparison, only the BF D-ND difference differed significantly, with opposite directions of side difference between groups (between group estimate, 1.74 kPa, p = 0.013). Controls also showed dominant side AKE and SLR differences of 1.00 degrees and 1.50 degrees, both below reported measurement error thresholds.Conclusions D and ND side patterns in hamstring stiffness and clinical flexibility varied according to the muscle, test, and group studied. The main between group difference emerged through BF stiffness, whereas the AKE and SLR differences observed in controls were limited in magnitude.
dc.description.issue10
dc.description.pages5451-5459
dc.description.sponsorshipNo funding was received for this study.
dc.description.volume126
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00421-026-06355-x
dc.identifier.issn1439-6319
dc.identifier.issn1439-6327
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-026-06355-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10376
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001822841400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.hasversion10.1007/s00421-026-06355-x
dc.relation.ispartofEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
dc.subjectHamstring
dc.subjectAsymmetry
dc.subjectShear wave elastography
dc.subjectFootball
dc.subjectActive knee extension
dc.subjectStraight leg raise
dc.subjectDominant
dc.subjectNondominant
dc.subjectINTER-LIMB ASYMMETRIES
dc.subjectMUSCLE INJURIES
dc.subjectELASTOGRAPHY
dc.subjectLEG
dc.subjectPhysiology
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.titleDominant and Nondominant Side Patterns in Hamstring Stiffness and Clinical Flexibility in Amateur Football Players and Healthy Controls
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage5459
oaire.citation.issue10
oaire.citation.startPage5451
oaire.citation.volume126
person.identifier.ridRCY-8119-2026
person.identifier.ridABA-2415-2020
person.identifier.ridJFK-7779-2023
person.identifier.ridGYU-9250-2022

Files

Collections