<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Using Cell Saver in liver transplantation: Analysis of the risk of bacterial contamination and cost-effectiveness

dc.contributor.authorCan, Meltem Guner
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Ali
dc.contributor.authorTunccan, Emre
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Tonguc Utku
dc.contributor.authorIyigun, Muzeyyen
dc.contributor.authorKeceoglu, Selim
dc.contributor.authorEmiroglu, Remzi
dc.contributor.authorKarakayali, Hamdi
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:10:00Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Liver transplantation is associated with substantial intraoperative blood loss and frequently requires extensive transfusion. Autologous blood transfusion (ABT) using the Cell Saver is frequently preferred to reduce the need for allogeneic transfusion. Autologous transfusion provides advantages in reducing immunologic and infectious risks; however, concerns remain regarding bacterial contamination and cost-effectiveness. Methods: This retrospective study included 197 patients underwent liver transplantation from January 2023 to July 2024. The Cell Saver was routinely used in all cases. Demographic data, transfusion volumes, and culture results from salvaged blood were analyzed. Bacterial contamination of the Cell Saver system-processed blood was the primary outcome. Transfusion requirements and cost analysis were secondary outcomes. Results: The mean autologous transfusion volume was 788.4 mL, with 1.7 units of erythrocytes and 1.2 units of plasma transfused. Autotransfusion blood cultures were positive in 53.4 % of the 73 tested patients (nonenteric, 34; enteric, 5), and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the only organism shared between intraoperative and postoperative cultures in two patients. The mean cost of transfusion products per patient intraoperatively was $990.95. Conclusion: The intraoperative use of the Cell Saver was microbiologically safe for liver transplantation. A significant proportion of salvaged blood samples exhibited bacterial contamination, primarily with nonenteric flora; however, this was not associated with an increased risk of post-transplant bacteremia. Enteric contamination was rare but clinically relevant in two cases, supporting continued use of ABT with caution in patients at risk of intraabdominal contamination. Furthermore, ABT might have contributed to lower transfusion costs compared with previously reported data. (c) 2026 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Society of Coloproctology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.pages3924-3931
dc.description.volume49
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.11.226
dc.identifier.issn1015-9584
dc.identifier.issn0219-3108
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.11.226
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11673
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001812669700001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
dc.relation.hasversion10.1016/j.asjsur.2025.11.226
dc.relation.ispartofASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
dc.subjectLiver transplantation
dc.subjectCell saver
dc.subjectAutologous blood transfusion
dc.subjectBacterial contamination
dc.subjectBlood management
dc.subjectINTRAOPERATIVE BLOOD SALVAGE
dc.subjectHEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA
dc.subjectAUTOLOGOUS TRANSFUSION
dc.subjectAUTOTRANSFUSION
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleUsing Cell Saver in liver transplantation: Analysis of the risk of bacterial contamination and cost-effectiveness
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage3931
oaire.citation.issue7
oaire.citation.startPage3924
oaire.citation.volume49
person.identifier.ridX-5041-2018

Files

Collections