<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Long-term outcomes of the Şimşek technique vs long scleral tunnel method in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation

dc.contributor.authorKaradag, Erdi
dc.contributor.authorSozen-Delil, Fatma Isil
dc.contributor.authorGun, Raziye Donmez
dc.contributor.authorKanar, Hatice Selen Sonmez
dc.contributor.authorSimsek, Saban
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:03:08Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo evaluate the long-term outcomes of the & Scedil;im & scedil;ek technique, a modified Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation using a scleral tunnel created with a 6-0 Prolene suture.MethodsThis retrospective, comparative study was conducted at a tertiary referral center and included glaucoma patients who underwent AGV implantation via either the & Scedil;im & scedil;ek technique (Group 1) or the classic long scleral tunnel technique (Group 2), with at least 12 months of follow-up. Group 1 included 44 patients (mean age: 54.8 +/- 19.3 years), and Group 2 consisted of 48 patients (mean age: 50 +/- 22.8 years). Pre- and postoperative assessments included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucomatous medications (NAGM), surgical success, and complications.ResultsMean follow-up duration was 22.6 +/- 7.6 months in Group 1 and 27.3 +/- 14.9 months in Group 2. No statistically significant differences were found between groups in IOP reduction (p = 0.237), NAGM at final visit (p = 0.054), or surgical success (p = 0.79). Complication rates were 54.5% in Group 1 and 56.3% in Group 2 (p = 1.000). Notably, no cases of tube exposure were observed in Group 1. Group 1 showed a significant improvement in BCVA compared to Group 2 (p = 0.003).ConclusionsThe & Scedil;im & scedil;ek Technique yielded comparable IOP control and surgical success to the conventional method, with significantly improved BCVA and reduced tube exposure risk. These findings suggest its suitability, especially in patients with thin conjunctiva or where visual function preservation is critical. Further prospective studies are warranted.
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.pages37
dc.description.volume46
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10792-025-03888-6
dc.identifier.issn0165-5701
dc.identifier.issn1573-2630
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03888-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11019
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001642085100002
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.hasversion10.1007/s10792-025-03888-6
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.subjectAhmed glaucoma valve
dc.subjectTube exposure
dc.subjectSuture-assisted implantation
dc.subjectLong scleral tunnel
dc.subjectSURGICAL TECHNIQUE
dc.subjectDRAINAGE DEVICES
dc.subjectPATCH GRAFT
dc.subjectEXPOSURE
dc.subjectTUBE
dc.subjectCONJUNCTIVA
dc.subjectOphthalmology
dc.titleLong-term outcomes of the Şimşek technique vs long scleral tunnel method in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.volume46
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4168-8740
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0234-8233
person.identifier.ridAEO-7591-2022
person.identifier.ridACH-2417-2022
person.identifier.ridKLC-4576-2024

Files

Collections