Landmark Regression with Attention U-Net for Assessing Breast Positioning Quality in MLO Mammography View
| dc.contributor.author | Denizoglu, Nurper | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tanyel, Toygar | |
| dc.contributor.author | Erkan, Enes Can | |
| dc.contributor.author | Seker, Mustafa Ege | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meltem, Emine | |
| dc.contributor.author | Cerekci, Esma Aktufan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alis, Deniz | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oksuz, Ilkay | |
| dc.contributor.author | Karaarslan, Ercan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Aribal, Erkin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-11-05T11:00:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Background/Objectives: This study developed and evaluated a novel Attention U-Net regression model to assess MLO mammography positioning quality, comparing it against a plain U-Net regression baseline (architectural ablation) and a ResNeXt50 classification baseline. Methods: We curated 1000 patient mammograms (2000 MLO images) from the public VinDr-Mammo dataset, with pectoral muscle line and nipple positions annotated by an expert breast radiologist. Three deep learning models were compared under a 10-fold stratified cross-validation protocol. Statistical significance was assessed with paired Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, McNemar's test, Cochran's Q, Wilson score confidence intervals, bootstrap confidence intervals, Holm-Bonferroni correction, and paired Cohen's d effect sizes. Results: Against the automated PNL reference, the Attention U-Net achieved 85.5% accuracy (Wilson 95% CI [83.9%, 87.0%]), 80.2% sensitivity, and 88.7% specificity, outperforming both the plain U-Net (71.8% accuracy) and ResNeXt50 (73.7% accuracy). (Cochran's Q p < 0.001; pairwise McNemar p < 0.001). For landmark localization, the Attention U-Net produced significantly lower errors across all five evaluated landmark and geometric measures (nipple 3.44 mm vs. 7.02 mm; perpendicular intersection 5.93 mm vs. 9.81 mm; all comparisons remained significant after Holm-Bonferroni correction). Conclusions: In this single-dataset, single-view study, an Attention U-Net landmark-regression model provided explicit landmark and PNL outputs for quantitative MLO mammography positioning assessment. The model showed improved accuracy and sensitivity compared with a plain U-Net regression baseline and a ResNeXt50 classification baseline. | |
| dc.description.issue | 14 | |
| dc.description.pages | 2262 | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | This paper has been produced benefiting from the 2510 Program of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (project no: 124N419). The paper also benefited from Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Projects (ITU BAP) funds, grant number 44250. | |
| dc.description.volume | 16 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/diagnostics16142262 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2075-4418 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16142262 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10379 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001833352300001 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | MDPI | |
| dc.relation.funding | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Trkiye | |
| dc.relation.funding | Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Projects (ITU BAP) funds | |
| dc.relation.funding | The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Trkiye [124N419] | |
| dc.relation.funding | Istanbul Technical University Scientific Research Projects (ITU BAP) funds [44250] | |
| dc.relation.hasversion | 10.3390/diagnostics16142262 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | DIAGNOSTICS | |
| dc.subject | breast cancer | |
| dc.subject | mammography | |
| dc.subject | deep learning | |
| dc.subject | positioning quality | |
| dc.subject | IMAGE QUALITY | |
| dc.subject | CANCER-DETECTION | |
| dc.subject | MORTALITY | |
| dc.subject | Medicine, General & Internal | |
| dc.subject | General & Internal Medicine | |
| dc.title | Landmark Regression with Attention U-Net for Assessing Breast Positioning Quality in MLO Mammography View | |
| dc.type | Article | |
| oaire.citation.edition | Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) | |
| oaire.citation.issue | 14 | |
| oaire.citation.volume | 16 | |
| person.identifier.rid | OJT-5059-2025 | |
| person.identifier.rid | AAU-1490-2020 | |
| person.identifier.rid | IZE-8247-2023 | |
| person.identifier.rid | AFO-5588-2022 | |
| person.identifier.rid | NXX-6226-2025 | |
| person.identifier.rid | HLV-9311-2023 | |
| person.identifier.rid | I-8364-2014 | |
| person.identifier.rid | PGT-6967-2026 |
