<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

There Is No Clinical and Radiological Difference between Suspensory and Cortical Button Fixation at the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear

dc.contributor.authorSarikaya, Gunes
dc.contributor.authorPaksoy, Ahmet Emre
dc.contributor.authorKarasahin, Omer
dc.contributor.authorKose, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorOllivier, Matthie P.
dc.contributor.authorKocaoglu, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:03:43Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurpose of the study The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the two surgical techniques; (Transosseous Fixation with the Suspensory Fixation System technique and Pull Out Suture Repair) for clinical and radio-logic scores and to investigate the effects on meniscal extrusion in Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear(MMPRT). Material and Methods This was a prospective single-center study. Patients undergoing MMPRT were divided into two groups. Group 1 patients were repaired with Transosseous Fixation with The Suspensory Fixation System technique while Group 2 patients were repaired with Pull Out Suture Repair with Cortical Button. Lysholm and Tegner Score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), meniscus extrusion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and K-L grade were recorded preop and postop at minimum one yearfollow-up. Results Meniscal extrusion on MRI increased in both groups at 12 months postoperatively compared to preoperative evaluation, but this increase was not statistically significant in both methods (Group 1: p = 0.670, Group 2: p = 0.211). There was no statistically significant difference in the pre-postoperative change in Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity score and meniscal extrusion on MRI in Group 1 compared to Group 2 (p = 0.575, p = 0.257 and, p = 0.141 respectively). Both Lysholm Knee Score (Group 1: p = 0.001, Group 2: p = 0.001) and Tegner Activity Score (Group 1: p = 0.008, Group 2: p < 0.001) increased statistically significantly at 12 months postoperatively compared to preoperative evaluation in Group 1 and Group 2. No patient in either group underwent total knee arthroplasty(TKA)at one-year follow-up. Conclusions The Suspensory Fixation System technique in MMPRT repair has been shown to be a feasible treatment method with similar functional and radiologic results compared to Pull Out Suture Repair with Cortical Button. At short-term follow up, the addition of a suspensory device to the conventional transtibial pullout repair did not result in a statistical difference on meniscal extrusion on MRI.
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.pages53-58
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Research Fund of the Ataturk University (Project Number: 11036) .
dc.description.volume93
dc.identifier.doi10.55095/achot2026/001
dc.identifier.issn0001-5415
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.55095/achot2026/001
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11099
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001720534400007
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGALEN SRO
dc.relation.fundingResearch Fund of the Ataturk University
dc.relation.fundingResearch Fund of the Ataturk University [11036]
dc.relation.hasversion10.55095/achot2026/001
dc.relation.ispartofACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA
dc.subjecttranstibial pullout repair
dc.subjectmeniscal root repair
dc.subjectmeniscal extrusion
dc.subjectmeniscus
dc.subjectposterior root tear
dc.subjectPROGNOSTIC-FACTORS
dc.subjectREPAIR
dc.subjectOUTCOMES
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleThere Is No Clinical and Radiological Difference between Suspensory and Cortical Button Fixation at the Treatment of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tear
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage58
oaire.citation.issue1
oaire.citation.startPage53
oaire.citation.volume93
person.identifier.ridAAM-3934-2020
person.identifier.ridJBJ-0597-2023
person.identifier.ridW-7954-2018

Files

Collections