<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Is three-dimensional reconstruction really necessary for glenoid version measurement on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with glenohumeral instability?

dc.contributor.authorKarademir, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorTunali, Onur
dc.contributor.authorDiril, Sabri Kerem
dc.contributor.authorCay, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAtalar, Ata Can
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:09:53Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The importance of glenoid version in glenohumeral instability (GHI) has become increasingly recognized. However, it remains unclear whether three-dimensional (3-D) correction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans provides more accurate glenoid version measurement in patients with GHI. The primary hypothesis of this study was that a statistically significant difference would exist between glenoid version values measured on standard two-dimensional (2-D) axial slices and those measured on 3-D-corrected axial slices. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of glenoid version measurements was performed in 54 patients (22 females, 32 males) with glenohumeral instability. Measurements were obtained using the Friedman method on standard 2-D axial MRI slices and 3-D-corrected axial MRI slices. Two observers performed each measurement twice. Measurements obtained by each observer were compared using paired t-tests. Measurement reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: For observer 1, mean glenoid version values were-0.69 degrees +/- 3.95 degrees and-1.24 degrees +/- 3.94 degrees on standard and 3-D-corrected axial MRI slices, respectively (p=0.16). For observer 2, corresponding values were-2.97 degrees +/- 4.48 degrees and-2.81 degrees +/- 4.92 degrees, respectively (p=0.66). Interobserver reliability was good for both techniques (ICC=0.87 for 2-D and 0.83 for 3-D measurements). Intraobserver reliability was excellent for measurements performed on 2-D slices (ICC=0.95 and 0.97) and ranged from good to excellent for measurements performed on 3-D-corrected slices (ICC=0.86 and 0.98). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggest that 3-D correction may not be necessary for glenoid version measurements performed on MRI in patients with glenohumeral instability. Multicenter studies with larger patient populations should be conducted to enhance the clinical relevance of these findings.
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.pages836-842
dc.description.volume32
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/tjtes.2026.58758
dc.identifier.issn1306-696X
dc.identifier.issn1307-7945
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2026.58758
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11663
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001825441700011
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTURKISH ASSOC TRAUMA EMERGENCY SURGERY
dc.relation.hasversion10.14744/tjtes.2026.58758
dc.relation.ispartofULUSAL TRAVMA VE ACIL CERRAHI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF TRAUMA & EMERGENCY SURGERY
dc.subjectGlenohumeral instability
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
dc.subjectthree-dimensional correction
dc.subjectPOSTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY
dc.subjectRETROVERSION
dc.subjectTOMOGRAPHY
dc.subjectEmergency Medicine
dc.titleIs three-dimensional reconstruction really necessary for glenoid version measurement on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with glenohumeral instability?
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage842
oaire.citation.issue7
oaire.citation.startPage836
oaire.citation.volume32
person.identifier.orcid0009-0005-4009-4106
person.identifier.ridB-2133-2016

Files

Collections