<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Dosimetric impact of daily MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy across different anatomical sites

dc.contributor.authorGoksel, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorGoksel, Evren Ozan
dc.contributor.authorYazici, Omer
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:09:36Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackgroundMR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) enables daily plan adaptation to account for anatomical variations; however, its resource-intensive workflow necessitates careful patient selection, and the relative benefit across anatomical sites remains to be clearly defined.AimTo systematically evaluate the site-dependent dosimetric impact of daily MRgART and identify anatomical regions deriving the greatest benefit from on-table adaptation.MethodsSixty-six patients treated with five-fraction SBRT on a 0.35 T MR-Linac were retrospectively analyzed: lung (n = 15), pancreas (n = 12), liver (n = 12), abdominal lymph node (n = 12), and prostate (n = 15). For each fraction, predicted and reoptimized plans were generated. Dose-volume parameters were normalized and cumulatively assessed using DVH summation. Target coverage (PTV D95, GTV/CTV D98), CI, GI, and OAR metrics were evaluated using paired Wilcoxon tests.ResultsThe largest median improvement in PTV D95 was observed in abdominal lymph node (5.3%), lung (4.4%), and prostate (4.1%) cohorts. Significant improvements in GTV/CTV D98 were observed in all sites except pancreas. CI improved significantly in all cohorts except prostate, whereas GI improvements were limited to abdominal lymph node and prostate cases. Although improvements in target coverage were limited in pancreatic cases, this subgroup demonstrated the most consistent reductions in gastrointestinal OAR doses. Lung cases showed significant improvement only in lung V20, while liver cases exhibited modest and heterogeneous OAR changes.ConclusionDaily MRgART provides site-dependent benefit, with the greatest clinical impact in pancreatic and abdominal lymph node cases. In high-volume settings, prioritization for daily adaptation may focus on these groups, followed by lung and prostate, while liver cases derive more limited benefit.
dc.description.sponsorshipNo funding was received for conducting this study.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11845-026-04484-y
dc.identifier.issn0021-1265
dc.identifier.issn1863-4362
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-026-04484-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11641
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001804610500001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER LONDON LTD
dc.relation.hasversion10.1007/s11845-026-04484-y
dc.relation.ispartofIRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
dc.subjectMRgART
dc.subjectMR-Linac
dc.subjectOnline Replanning
dc.subjectOn-table Adaptive RT
dc.subjectSBRT
dc.subjectSTEREOTACTIC BODY RADIOTHERAPY
dc.subjectONLINE
dc.subjectLIVER
dc.subjectBENEFIT
dc.subjectLINAC
dc.subjectLUNG
dc.subjectMedicine, General & Internal
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.titleDosimetric impact of daily MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy across different anatomical sites
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-3734-526X
person.identifier.ridE-4762-2017

Files

Collections