Comparison of the diagnostic performance of the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS algorithm with established classification systems for thyroid nodules
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
dc.identifier.issn
1305-3612
dc.identifier.doi
10.4274/dir.2025.253428
dc.identifier.other
dc.description.volume
32
dc.description.issue
4
Publisher
TURKISH SOC RADIOLOGY
DOI
10.4274/dir.2025.253428
10.4274/dir.2025.253428
10.4274/dir.2025.253428
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of various Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (TIRADS), with a particular focus on the artificial intelligence-based TIRADS (AI-TIRADS), in characterizing thyroid nodules. METHODS In this retrospective study conducted between April 2016 and May 2022, 1,322 thyroid nodules from 1,139 patients with confirmed cytopathological diagnoses were included. Each nodule was assessed using TIRADS classifications defined by the American College of Radiology (ACR-TIRADS), the American Thyroid Association (ATA-TIRADS), the European Thyroid Association (EU-TIRADS), the Korean Thyroid Association (K-TIRADS), and the AI-TIRADS. Three radiologists independently evaluated the ultrasound (US) characteristics of the nodules using all classification systems. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value, and comparisons were made using the McNemar test. RESULTS Among the nodules, 846 (64%) were benign, 299 (22.6%) were of intermediate risk, and 147 (11.1%) were malignant. The AI-TIRADS demonstrated a PPV of21.2%and a specificity of 53.6%, outperforming the other systems in specificity without compromising sensitivity. The specificities of the ACR-TI-RADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 44.6%, 39.3%, 40.1%, and 40.1%, respectively (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS: P < 0.001). The PPVs for the ACR-TIRADS, the ATA-TIRADS, the EU-TIRADS, and the K-TIRADS were 18.5%, 17.9%, 17.9%, and 17.4%,respective-ly (all pairwise comparisons with the AI-TIRADS, excluding the ACR-TIRADS: P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The AI-TIRADS shows promise in improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies in thyroid nodule assessment while maintaining high sensitivity. The findings suggest that the AI-TIRADS may enhance risk stratification, leading to better patient management. Additionally, the study found that the presence of multiple suspicious US features markedly increases the risk of malignancy, whereas isolated features do not substantially elevate the risk. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The AI-TIRADS can enhance thyroid nodule risk stratification by improving diagnostic specificity and reducing unnecessary biopsies, potentially leading to more efficient patient management and better utilization of healthcare resources.
Description
Keywords
Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data Systems , thyroid cancer , artificial intelligence , thyroid nodules , ultrasonography , FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION , RISK STRATIFICATION , AMERICAN-COLLEGE , MALIGNANCY RISK , TI-RADS , MANAGEMENT , ULTRASOUND , ASSOCIATION , PREVALENCE , GUIDELINES , Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
