<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Effect of Vancomycin Powder in Reducing Infection After Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Its Complications: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis

dc.contributor.authorSalimi, Maryam
dc.contributor.authorKeshtkar, Alireza
dc.contributor.authorAbdelnaser, Mohammad Kamal
dc.contributor.authorMosalamiaghili, Seyed Arad
dc.contributor.authorSaka, Natsumi
dc.contributor.authorParvizi, Javad
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:10:06Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip or knee arthroplasty greatly increases morbidity and costs. Local antibiotic powders may help curb infections while minimizing systemic toxicity. We assessed their efficacy and safety in preventing PJI. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central Registry of Clinical Trials (CENTRAL), Web of Science, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature for studies published from January 1990 to January 2024. Eligible trials compared intraoperative antibiotic powder with no powder in primary or revision arthroplasty. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Methodologic quality was assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2), ROB 2, and ROBINS-I; evidence certainty was rated with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Stratified analyses examined dose, surgical type, and administration technique. There were 10 secondary studies (comprising 22 primary studies with 137,651 patients)& horbar;all evaluating vancomycin powder (VP)& horbar;that met the inclusion criteria. Results: Pooled data showed no significant reduction with VP in total infections (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.62 to 1.18), superficial infections, or PJI specifically. High-quality, randomized, and prospective studies have likewise demonstrated no prophylactic benefit. Retrospective studies suggested benefit, but their certainty was low to very low. The application of VP did not increase local wound complications or systemic adverse events. Conclusions: Robust evidence from randomized and prospective research does not support the routine use of vancomycin powder to prevent infection in hip or knee arthroplasty. Favorable findings from retrospective analyses are insufficient to outweigh the lack of benefit in high-quality trials. Routine intraoperative VP application cannot be recommended until stronger evidence emerges. (c) 2025 Published by Elsevier Inc.
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.pages2221-2231
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arth.2025.10.053
dc.identifier.issn0883-5403
dc.identifier.issn1532-8406
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.10.053
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11682
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001783317600001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
dc.relation.hasversion10.1016/j.arth.2025.10.053
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY
dc.subjectperiprosthetic joint infection (PJI)
dc.subjecthip arthroplasty
dc.subjectknee arthroplasty
dc.subjectlocal antibiotics
dc.subjectvancomycin powder
dc.subjectumbrella review
dc.subjectPERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION
dc.subjectSURGICAL SITE INFECTION
dc.subjectPOVIDONE-IODINE LAVAGE
dc.subjectINTRAWOUND VANCOMYCIN
dc.subjectCLINICAL-TRIALS
dc.subjectEFFICACY
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectPROPHYLAXIS
dc.subjectSURGERY
dc.subjectQUALITY
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.titleEffect of Vancomycin Powder in Reducing Infection After Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty and Its Complications: An Umbrella Review and Meta-Analysis
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage2231
oaire.citation.issue7
oaire.citation.startPage2221
oaire.citation.volume41
person.identifier.ridMTF-6801-2025
person.identifier.ridAHC-5205-2022

Files

Collections