<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

DNA Methylation Signatures Distinguish Breast Cancer Histological Subtypes and Predict Hormone Receptor Status: A TCGA-Based Integrative Analysis

dc.contributor.authorOzdemir, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Eylul
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Turna
dc.contributor.authorTelciyan, Karen
dc.contributor.authorAkkus, Alper
dc.contributor.authorYucesan, Emrah
dc.contributor.authorEralp, Yesim
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ozden Hatirnaz
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:03:28Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractObjective: DNA methylation alterations contribute to breast cancer heterogeneity, yet their utility for distinguishing histological subtypes remains underexplored. This study aimed to identify genome-wide methylation signatures across breast cancer subtypes and develop compact probe panels for molecular classification. Materials and Methods: HumanMethylation450 (HM450) data from 99 samples (40 infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC), 40 infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC), 14 metaplastic, 5 medullary) and 1,098 clinical samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA) were analyzed. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) were identified using limma with Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate correction. Support vector machine classifiers with minimal probe panels were developed for hormone receptor endpoints. Results: Of the 404,059 quality-filtered CpG probes, 88,909 (22.0%) were differentially methylated across subtypes (False discovery rate (FDR)<0.05). The ILC-metaplastic comparison yielded the largest divergence (58,661 DMPs). Classifiers achieved area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.935, 0.934, and 0.866 for estrogen receptor (ER), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and progesterone receptor (PR) status, respectively, using 8-bit polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fifteen CpG probes in internal cross-validation. Conclusion: Histological subtypes harbor distinct methylation landscapes dominated by global hypomethylation in metaplastic carcinoma. Compact CpG probe panels predict hormone receptor status with high accuracy in internal cross-validation, suggesting the potential of methylation-based diagnostic assays as a complementary approach to immunohistochemistry (IHC), pending external validation.
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.pages157-176
dc.description.volume16
dc.identifier.doi10.26650/experimed.1930098
dc.identifier.issn2667-5846
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.26650/experimed.1930098
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11066
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001850615000010
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherISTANBUL UNIV
dc.relation.hasversion10.26650/experimed.1930098
dc.relation.ispartofEXPERIMED
dc.subjectDNA Methylation
dc.subjectBreast Neoplasms
dc.subjectMachine Learning
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectReceptors
dc.subjectMOLECULAR PORTRAITS
dc.subjectMedicine, Research & Experimental
dc.subjectResearch & Experimental Medicine
dc.titleDNA Methylation Signatures Distinguish Breast Cancer Histological Subtypes and Predict Hormone Receptor Status: A TCGA-Based Integrative Analysis
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
oaire.citation.endPage176
oaire.citation.issue2
oaire.citation.startPage157
oaire.citation.volume16
person.identifier.orcid0009-0003-4877-8997
person.identifier.orcid0009-0005-8696-0284
person.identifier.ridABO-8565-2022
person.identifier.ridW-8018-2018
person.identifier.ridKHT-1843-2024
person.identifier.ridAAD-7194-2020

Files

Collections