<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Tether Breakage Across First-generation and Second-generation Vertebral Body Tethering Devices in Treating Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

dc.contributor.authorColeman, Thomas A.
dc.contributor.authorKim, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Vineet
dc.contributor.authorParent, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorMiyanji, Firoz
dc.contributor.authorAlanay, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Sulagna
dc.contributor.authorAnari, Jason B.
dc.contributor.authorLullo, Brett R.
dc.contributor.authorCahill, Patrick J.
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:00:51Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground Tether breakage is a significant complication that can occur when performing vertebral body tethering (VBT) in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). While previous studies have reported tether breakage rates, the incidence of tether breakage across medical device manufacturers and VBT models remains unknown. This study aims to define the rate of tether breakage in second-generation device systems compared with their first-generation counterparts. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, multicenter registry was performed for all patients with AIS treated from 2011 to 2021 who underwent thoracic VBT with at least 2 years of follow-up. Radiographic tether breakage, as defined by an increase in adjacent screw angle >5 degrees during the postoperative period, was analyzed across the first-generation and the second-generation vertebral body tethering devices from within the same product line. Wilcoxon rank tests and Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare differences across cohorts. Results: Two hundred thirty-one patients across 12 centers were included in the final analysis. One hundred seventy-nine patients received first-generation implants from 2011 to 2018, and 52 patients from 2017 to 2021 received second-generation vertebral body tethering devices. In total, radiographically identified tether breakage occurred in 116 patients (50%). The rate of radiographic tether breakage did not differ across generations (52% vs. 44%; P=0.46). Four patients (8%) who received the newer VBT system underwent revision compared with 15 patients (8%) who were implanted with first-generation instrumentation (P=0.87). In addition, only 1 patient (2%) who received the second-generation device and 8 patients (4%) who received the older VBT system were converted to posterior spinal fusion within 2 years of index surgery (P=0.69). Interestingly, the surgeon observed rate of tether breakage significantly decreased from the first generation of VBT devices to the second (21% vs. 2%; P<0.001). Conclusion: Tether breakage remains high in cases when using the new tether devices and is comparable to rates observed with the older models, despite lower rates of surgeon-reported breakage.
dc.description.issue8
dc.description.pages484-490
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported in part by grants to the Setting Scoliosis Straight Foundation in support of Harms Study Group research from Astura Medical, Atec, Biedermann Motech, DePuy Synthes Spine, Globus-NuVasive, Highridge, Medtronic, Orthopediatrics, Pacira Biosciences, Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America, Stryker Spine, Inc., and the Food and Drug Administration.
dc.description.volume46
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/BPO.0000000000003368
dc.identifier.issn0271-6798
dc.identifier.issn1539-2570
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0000000000003368
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10576
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001841569000024
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
dc.relation.fundingAstura Medical
dc.relation.fundingAtec
dc.relation.fundingBiedermann Motech
dc.relation.fundingDePuy Synthes Spine
dc.relation.fundingGlobus-NuVasive
dc.relation.fundingHighridge
dc.relation.fundingMedtronic(Medtronic)
dc.relation.fundingOrthopediatrics
dc.relation.fundingPacira Biosciences
dc.relation.fundingPediatric Orthopedic Society of North America
dc.relation.fundingStryker Spine, Inc.
dc.relation.fundingFood and Drug Administration(United States Department of Health & Human ServicesUS Food & Drug Administration (FDA))
dc.relation.fundingMedtronic
dc.relation.fundingFood and Drug Administration
dc.relation.hasversion10.1097/BPO.0000000000003368
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS
dc.subjectvertebral body tethering
dc.subjectadolescent idiopathic scoliosis
dc.subjecttether breakage
dc.subjectSKELETALLY IMMATURE PATIENTS
dc.subjectPOSTERIOR SPINAL-FUSION
dc.subjectGROWTH
dc.subjectMODULATION
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.titleTether Breakage Across First-generation and Second-generation Vertebral Body Tethering Devices in Treating Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage490
oaire.citation.issue8
oaire.citation.startPage484
oaire.citation.volume46
person.identifier.ridAAO-7492-2020
person.identifier.ridD-7634-2015

Files

Collections