<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Interference Screw and Suture Anchor Fixation for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Yield No Significant Differences in Load to Failure, While Staple Fixation Lags Behind: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study

dc.contributor.authorGilat, Ron
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Zeeshan A.
dc.contributor.authorVillareal-Espinosa, Juan Bernardo
dc.contributor.authorBi, Andrew S.
dc.contributor.authorJawanda, Harkirat S.
dc.contributor.authorJackson, Garrett R.
dc.contributor.authorGursoy, Safa
dc.contributor.authorMameri, Enzo S.
dc.contributor.authorShewman, Elizabeth F.
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorGelber, Pablo E.
dc.contributor.authorChahla, Jorge
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:02:31Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the biomechanical properties and failure mechanisms of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed using onlay staple, inlay interference screw, and onlay all-suture anchor fixation techniques. Methods: Twenty-four nonmatched pairs of human cadaveric knees were randomized to receive a cortical staple (n = 8), an interference screw (n = 8), or an all-suture anchor (n = 8). A modified Lemaire LET technique was performed for all knees using their respective fixation technique. Biomechanical testing was performed using a tensile-testing apparatus (MTS Systems). All knees were subjected to an axially directed preload cycle and subsequently assessed for cyclic and load-to-failure outcomes. Results were analyzed via analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, and post-hoc Tukey tests. Results: Three staple-fixated LETs failed during the cyclic loading and were excluded from analysis. Average elongation after cyclic loading was 2.89 mm (staple), 2.06 mm (screw), and 3.51 mm (anchor) (P = .134). Average maximum load to failure was 174.1 N (staple), 250.8 N (screw), and 199.2 N (anchor), with a significant between-group difference on analysis of variance testing (P = .023). Post hoc analysis revealed staple fixation had a significantly lower maximum load than interference screw fixation (P = .026). Displacement at maximum load was significantly higher in the anchor group (22.2 mm) compared to the staple (11.3 mm) (P = .05). Conclusions: While staple fixation resulted in early failure, both interference screw and anchor fixations are viable options for LET, with suture anchors offering less rigidity under high loads when compared with either fixation strategy. However, no differences were observed in elongation during cyclic loading. Clinical Relevance: Emerging literature has revealed a 70% tunnel convergence rate when utilizing an interference screw for femoral fixation of a LET. The results of the present time-zero cadaveric study explore the role of surface-based fixation methods, given that it may mitigate convergence risk.
dc.description.issue11
dc.description.pages4733-4739
dc.description.volume41
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.029
dc.identifier.issn0749-8063
dc.identifier.issn1526-3231
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.029
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10928
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001633579200029
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.hasversion10.1016/j.arthro.2025.06.029
dc.relation.ispartofARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY
dc.subjectCRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION
dc.subjectKNEE
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleInterference Screw and Suture Anchor Fixation for Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Yield No Significant Differences in Load to Failure, While Staple Fixation Lags Behind: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage4739
oaire.citation.issue11
oaire.citation.startPage4733
oaire.citation.volume41
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4466-9657
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1703-6232
person.identifier.ridKMA-3773-2024

Files

Collections