<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Evaluation of the pSOFA Score in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Its Discriminative Performance Compared with PRISM 4 and PIM 3

dc.contributor.authorSari, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorSarac, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorAtakul, Gulhan
dc.contributor.authorTopal, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorColak, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorSoydan, Ekin
dc.contributor.authorAgin, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorAliyeva, Aynur
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:01:09Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We aimed to evaluate the performance of the age-adapted Pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (pSOFA) score, as a predictor of mortality in patients admitted to pediatric intensive care units (PICUs), and to compare it with the Pediatric Risk of Mortality 4 (PRISM 4) and Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 (PIM 3) scores. Methods: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed data from 1440 eligible PICU admissions to a tertiary PICU. The pSOFA, PRISM 4, and PIM 3 scores were calculated retrospectively for each patient. Results: The overall mortality was 13.1%, and the median length of stay was 11 days. The median (IQR) pSOFA score was significantly higher in non-survivors than in survivors [6 (4-10) vs. 3 (2-4), p < 0.001]. Mortality increased significantly with increasing pSOFA scores (p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for pSOFA, PRISM 4, and PIM 3 were 0.807, 0.847, and 0.781, respectively. The pSOFA score exhibited a significant positive correlation with both PRISM 4 and PIM 3 (p < 0.001). PRISM 4 and PIM 3 demonstrated evidence of miscalibration in this cohort, with observed mortality exceeding mean predicted mortality for both models. Conclusions: pSOFA demonstrated good discrimination for PICU mortality and a strong association with mortality in this single-center retrospective cohort. PRISM 4 showed significantly greater discrimination than pSOFA, whereas pSOFA and PIM 3 did not differ significantly. These findings support further prospective multicenter evaluation before broader clinical implementation.
dc.description.issue19
dc.description.pages3162
dc.description.volume14
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/healthcare14193162
dc.identifier.issn2227-9032
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14193162
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10657
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001903748400001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.hasversion10.3390/healthcare14193162
dc.relation.ispartofHEALTHCARE
dc.subjectpSOFA
dc.subjectPRISM 4
dc.subjectPIM 3
dc.subjectmortality prediction
dc.subjectprognostic scores
dc.subjectPREDICTING MORTALITY
dc.subjectSOFA
dc.subjectPERSPECTIVE
dc.subjectSEPSIS
dc.subjectINDEX
dc.subjectHealth Care Sciences & Services
dc.subjectHealth Policy & Services
dc.titleEvaluation of the pSOFA Score in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit and Its Discriminative Performance Compared with PRISM 4 and PIM 3
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.editionSocial Science Citation Index (SSCI)
oaire.citation.issue19
oaire.citation.volume14
person.identifier.ridJLL-9304-2023
person.identifier.ridAFW-8030-2022
person.identifier.ridISU-8848-2023
person.identifier.ridJAO-2810-2023
person.identifier.ridJYQ-2668-2024
person.identifier.ridJDW-3813-2023
person.identifier.ridLKM-1454-2024

Files

Collections