<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Anesthesia in Pediatric Radiotherapy: A Systematic Literature Review by the SIOP Europe Working Group on Pediatric Anesthesia in Radiation Therapy

dc.contributor.authorTurcas, Andrada
dc.contributor.authorBoterberg, Tom
dc.contributor.authorFrykholm, Peter
dc.contributor.authorGaze, Mark
dc.contributor.authorHendriks, Mark
dc.contributor.authorJouglar, Emmanuel
dc.contributor.authorKostense, Zaiti
dc.contributor.authorMaduro, John
dc.contributor.authorMondardini, Maria Cristina
dc.contributor.authorNaik, Vibhavari
dc.contributor.authorOzgen, Serpil
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Monica
dc.contributor.authorWhitfield, Gillian
dc.contributor.authorBolle, Stephanie Lilianne E.
dc.contributor.authorOpitz, Lucas
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:03:59Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractRadiotherapy (RT) is essential in pediatric cancer treatment and often requires complete immobility. In younger or noncompliant children, this is typically achieved through sedation or general anesthesia (GA), which raises concerns about acute complications and potential long-term neurodevelopmental effects. Despite widespread use, standardized anesthesia protocols for pediatric RT are lacking. To support the development of practice recommendations, the SIOPE Working Group on Pediatric Anesthesia in Radiation Therapy conducted a systematic literature review. Studies from Medline and Embase were reviewed (March-September 2024) according to PRISMA guidelines, focusing on sedation and GA in pediatric RT. Thirty-nine studies were included, mostly retrospective and of low to moderate quality. Considerable heterogeneity was observed in anesthetic techniques, staffing, and monitoring. Propofol-based sedation was most frequently reported, with favorable safety when delivered by experienced pediatric anesthetists. Complication rates varied widely and were often poorly defined. Additional concerns included long-term neurocognitive impact, vascular access, and procedural burden, especially in resource-limited settings. Evidence supports the safe use of sedation/GA in pediatric RT, but current literature is limited and inconsistent. Standardized protocols and prospective studies are urgently needed to better define safety, long-term outcomes, and staffing requirements.
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.pagese70090
dc.description.volume73
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/1545-5017.70090
dc.identifier.issn1545-5009
dc.identifier.issn1545-5017
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1002/1545-5017.70090
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11132
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001652384300001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.hasversion10.1002/1545-5017.70090
dc.relation.ispartofPEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER
dc.subjectGENERAL-ANESTHESIA
dc.subjectCHILDREN
dc.subjectSEDATION
dc.subjectEXPOSURE
dc.subjectPROPOFOL
dc.subjectDEXMEDETOMIDINE
dc.subjectCOMPLICATIONS
dc.subjectCHILDHOOD
dc.subjectTOLERANCE
dc.subjectSESSIONS
dc.subjectOncology
dc.subjectHematology
dc.subjectPediatrics
dc.titleAnesthesia in Pediatric Radiotherapy: A Systematic Literature Review by the SIOP Europe Working Group on Pediatric Anesthesia in Radiation Therapy
dc.typeReview
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.issue4
oaire.citation.volume73
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6786-7117
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6813-9023
person.identifier.orcid0009-0002-8577-2650
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4886-4329
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-2458-8702
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-1311-9214
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3686-2481
person.identifier.ridHTO-0764-2023
person.identifier.ridHGA-7485-2022
person.identifier.ridIUM-8083-2023
person.identifier.ridAAK-6297-2021
person.identifier.ridY-5116-2018
person.identifier.ridL-4364-2015

Files

Collections