<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

The low power effect on holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP); A comparison between 20W and 37,5W energy regarding apical enucleation efficacy and patient safety

dc.contributor.authorGazel, E.
dc.contributor.authorKaya, E.
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, S.
dc.contributor.authorTokas, T.
dc.contributor.authorAybal, H. C.
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, S.
dc.contributor.authorAydogan, T. B.
dc.contributor.authorTunc, L.
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:02:26Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractIntroduction. - The Holmium laser has proven to be an invaluable tool for endoscopic prostate enucleation. The proper energy selection, during the different steps of the procedure, has always been a matter of debate. In this work we compare the effectiveness of the Holmium laser, using two different tow-power energy settings, during enucleation and hemostasis (20W and 37.5W). Methods. - One hundred and sixty patients underwent a HoLEP procedure with a 50 Hz and 2J (100W) setting. During enuleation and hemostasis, two different low-power settings were applied (20W vs. 37.5W). In both groups, only the prostatic tissue in the bladder neck and enucteated tissue far away from the apex, were cut with a setting of 50 Hz and 2J (100W). Results. - The mean enucleation efficiency (0.78 vs. 1.2 g/min-p:001) was significantly higher by utilizing 37.5 W energy (group 2). Additionally, the mean enucleation rate (0.64 vs. 0.88%-P:0.001) and laser efficiency (2.07 vs. 2.12 joule/g-P:0.003) were significantly higher in group 2. The enucleation time was significantly shorter (54 vs. 75.5 mins-P:0.002), while the mean catheter removal time (27 vs. 42 hrs-P:0.008) and Hb decrease (0.5 vs. 0.6 g/dl-P:0.019) were significantly lower in group 2. Conclusions. - HoLEP can be performed efficiently with 100 W-37.5 W settings. Enucleation and hemostasis can be performed successfully with 37.5 W, while the use of 100 W during bladder neck dissection shortens the duration of the procedure. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
dc.description.issue12
dc.description.pages632-638
dc.description.volume30
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.009
dc.identifier.issn1166-7087
dc.identifier.issn2405-5131
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.009
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10914
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000582677400003
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
dc.relation.hasversion10.1016/j.purol.2020.05.009
dc.relation.ispartofPROGRES EN UROLOGIE
dc.subjectHolmium laser
dc.subjectHoLEP
dc.subjectBPH
dc.subjectLow-energy
dc.subjectLaser energy
dc.subjectMECHANICAL MORCELLATION
dc.subjectOUTCOMES
dc.subjectUrology & Nephrology
dc.titleThe low power effect on holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP); A comparison between 20W and 37,5W energy regarding apical enucleation efficacy and patient safety
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.endPage638
oaire.citation.issue12
oaire.citation.startPage632
oaire.citation.volume30
person.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0928-0507
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6483-9249
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6820-6708
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5112-6063
person.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9123-6139
person.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2000-7790
person.identifier.ridJ-7549-2019
person.identifier.ridAAK-9364-2020
person.identifier.ridABT-8928-2022
person.identifier.ridL-6663-2014
person.identifier.ridP-1153-2016

Files

Collections