<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Discoid medial meniscus: a systematic review of clinical presentation, surgical management and outcomes

dc.contributor.authorAkayoglu, Yilmaz Kerem
dc.contributor.authorSahbat, Yavuz
dc.contributor.authorKose, Ozkan
dc.contributor.authorKocaoglu, Baris
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To systematically synthesize the literature dedicated to discoid medial meniscus (DMM) and to describe its clinical presentation, imaging and arthroscopic features, morphology, associated pathology, management, outcomes, and temporal reporting patterns. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched through 24 June 2026. Original human reports of radiologically or intraoperatively confirmed classic DMM with extractable clinical, imaging, treatment, or outcome data were eligible. Reports limited to discoid lateral meniscus, nonclinical anatomical studies, reviews without unique cases, duplicate cohorts, or without separable DMM data were excluded. Data were synthesized descriptively with variable-specific denominators; quality was assessed using design-appropriate JBI or MINORS tools. Results: Ninety reports described 179 patients/cases and 241 DMM knees; 117/164 were male (71.3%). Bilateral DMM was reported in 62/149 patients (41.6%), complete morphology in 103/151 knees (68.2%), and tears in 149/196 knees (76.0%). Surgery was reported in 180/241 knees (74.7%): rim-preserving procedures in 142/180 operated knees (78.9%), total meniscectomy in 29 (16.1%), repair in 34 (18.9%), and allograft transplantation in 3 (1.7%). Contemporary reports more often described MRI, rim preservation, and repair than historical reports. Conclusions: Evidence consisted predominantly of case reports and small series. Bilateral involvement, complete morphology, and tears were frequently reported, while contemporary literature more often described MRI, arthroscopy, and meniscal preservation. These are published-literature patterns, not population estimates or comparative evidence of treatment effectiveness. Standardized multicenter or registry-based studies are needed. Level of evidence: Level V, systematic review of Level IV-V evidence. (c) 2026 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
dc.description.pages104614
dc.description.volume63
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.knee.2026.104614
dc.identifier.issn0968-0160
dc.identifier.issn1873-5800
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2026.104614
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10530
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001862682900001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherELSEVIER
dc.relation.hasversion10.1016/j.knee.2026.104614
dc.relation.ispartofKNEE
dc.subjectDiscoid medial meniscus
dc.subjectDiscoid meniscus
dc.subjectMeniscal repair
dc.subjectMeniscoplasty
dc.subjectSaucerization
dc.subjectSystematic review
dc.subjectHORIZONTAL CLEAVAGE TEAR
dc.subjectBUCKET-HANDLE TEAR
dc.subjectADULT PATIENT
dc.subjectBONE CHANGES
dc.subjectKNEE
dc.subjectASSOCIATION
dc.subjectDIAGNOSIS
dc.subjectMRI
dc.subjectOrthopedics
dc.subjectSport Sciences
dc.subjectSurgery
dc.titleDiscoid medial meniscus: a systematic review of clinical presentation, surgical management and outcomes
dc.typeReview
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.volume63
person.identifier.ridP-8732-2016
person.identifier.ridW-7954-2018
person.identifier.ridGXF-0361-2022

Files

Collections