Responsiveness and minimal important change of Turkish pain-related psychological measures in chronic non-specific low back pain
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
dc.identifier.issn
0785-3890
1365-2060
1365-2060
dc.identifier.doi
10.1080/07853890.2026.2725978
dc.identifier.other
dc.description.volume
58
dc.description.issue
1
Publisher
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI
10.1080/07853890.2026.2725978
10.1080/07853890.2026.2725978
10.1080/07853890.2026.2725978
Abstract
Background The longitudinal interpretability of Turkish pain-related psychological measures in chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) remains uncertain. This study evaluated the responsiveness and minimal important change (MIC) of the Turkish Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) and Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).Methods In this prospective, single-arm measurement-property study, 110 adults with chronic NSLBP completed baseline and 4-week assessments during a standardized rehabilitation program. Distribution-based responsiveness was assessed using effect size and standardized response mean. Associations with Global Rating of Change (GRC)-defined improvement were examined using correlations and receiver operating characteristic analysis. MIC uncertainty was estimated by stratified bootstrap resampling with 20,000 iterations.Results Fifty-two participants were classified as improved and 58 as not improved. FABQ change scores were strongly correlated with GRC and showed excellent discrimination (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.943-0.977). GRC-defined MIC estimates (95% bootstrap confidence interval (CI)) were 5 (5-5) for FABQ-Physical Activity and 7 (6-8) for FABQ-Work. PCS correlations and discrimination were more modest (AUC = 0.647-0.700); MIC estimates ranged from 2 to 6 points, with the widest interval for PCS-Total [6 (3-11)]. TSK change was unrelated to GRC (rho = 0.014; AUC = 0.508), and no MIC was estimated.Conclusions In this rehabilitation context, FABQ change scores corresponded most strongly to GRC-defined improvement. PCS MIC estimates were less precise, whereas TSK change did not distinguish global improvement. These estimates are context-specific and require external validation.
Description
Keywords
Fear , low back pain , pain measurement , patient-reported outcome measures , psychometrics , AVOIDANCE BELIEFS QUESTIONNAIRE , FEAR-AVOIDANCE , CATASTROPHIZING SCALE , PHYSICAL-THERAPY , ITALIAN SUBJECTS , TAMPA SCALE , RELIABILITY , VERSION , VALIDATION , KINESIOPHOBIA , Medicine, General & Internal , General & Internal Medicine
