<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Factors Affecting Disparity Between Estimated Liver Volume and Actual Liver Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Tonguc Utku
dc.contributor.authorTunccan, Emre
dc.contributor.authorCetisli, Abdurrahman Furkan
dc.contributor.authorKus, Aylin Altan
dc.contributor.authorOzdil, Guzide
dc.contributor.authorOzer, Ali
dc.contributor.authorYildar, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKarakayali, Hamdi
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:00:28Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground: Volumetric evaluation is critical in living donor liver transplantation. Liver volume, depending on body weight and height, and radiological estimates have made important contributions, but some inconsistencies remain. We aimed to assess the estimated and radiological liver volumes with respect to actual graft weight and potential factors contributing to inaccuracy. Method: A total of 623 donors were evaluated in this retrospective study. The estimated liver volumes were calculated with the Vauthey formula. The laboratory and liver biopsy results were obtained. Three-dimensional liver tomography was used to assess liver volume. Actual graft weight was measured on the back table after perfusion. Graft types were recorded. A discrepancy of more than 10% is accepted as discordant. The possible reasons were evaluated. Results: The mean estimated liver volume and radiological liver volume were 1216 cm3 and 1290 cm3, respectively. The mean radiological right lobe volume and the actual right lobe graft weight were 815 and 846, respectively. Liver density, liver steatosis percentage, blood cholesterol levels, blood triglyceride levels, and blood total bilirubin levels are factors contributing to the disparity between the estimated and radiological volume differences. Vitamin B12 and albumin levels were associated with the discrepancy between radiological liver volume and actual graft weight. Underestimation was significant in the left lateral lobe. Conclusions: Three-dimensional volumetry is useful for size matching. Discrepancies of more than 10% are attributable to liver steatosis or splitting lines.
dc.description.issue15
dc.description.pages2442
dc.description.volume16
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/diagnostics16152442
dc.identifier.issn2075-4418
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152442
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/10443
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001847249700001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.hasversion10.3390/diagnostics16152442
dc.relation.ispartofDIAGNOSTICS
dc.subjectliving donor liver transplantation
dc.subjectdonor hepatectomy
dc.subjectthree-dimensional volumetry
dc.subjectestimated graft volume
dc.subjectactual graft weight
dc.subjectGRAFT
dc.subjectWEIGHT
dc.subjectSIZE
dc.subjectACCURACY
dc.subjectFORMULA
dc.subjectAGE
dc.subjectMedicine, General & Internal
dc.subjectGeneral & Internal Medicine
dc.titleFactors Affecting Disparity Between Estimated Liver Volume and Actual Liver Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionScience Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED)
oaire.citation.issue15
oaire.citation.volume16

Files

Collections