Browsing by Author "Canyilmaz, Emine"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Estimation of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients with pelvic irradiation
    (WILEY, 2020-01-01) Haciislamoglu, Emel; Gungor, Gorkem; Aydin, Gokhan; Canyilmaz, Emine; Guler, Ozan Cem; Zengin, Ahmet Yasar; Yenice, Kamil Mehmet
    We aimed to estimate the risk of secondary cancer after radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients with pelvic irradiation. Computed tomography data of five biopsy-proven HRPC patients were selected for this study. Two different planning target volumes (PTV(1)and PTV2) were contoured for each patient. The PTV(1)included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic lymphatics, while the PTV(2)included only the prostate and seminal vesicles. The prescribed dose was 54 Gy for the PTV(1)with a sequential boost (24 Gy for the PTV2). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used to generate treatment plans with 6 and 10 MV photon energies with the flattening filter (FF) or flattening filter-free (FFF) irradiation mode. The excess absolute risks (EARs) were calculated and compared for the bladder, rectum, pelvic bone, and soft tissue based on the linear-exponential, plateau, full mechanistic, and specific mechanistic sarcoma dose-response model. According to the models, all treatment plans resulted in similar risks of secondary bladder or rectal cancer and pelvic bone or soft tissue sarcoma except for the estimated risk of the bladder according to the full mechanistic model using IMRT((6MV
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Secondary cancer risk after whole-breast radiation therapy: field-in-field versus intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy
    (BRITISH INST RADIOLOGY, 2019-01-01) Haciislamoglu, Emel; Cinar, Yunus; Gurcan, Fatih; Canyilmaz, Emine; Gungor, Gorkem; Yoney, Adnan
    Objective: In this study, we used the concept of organ-equivalent dose (OED) to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for breast cancer. Methods: Using CT data set of 12 patients, we generated three different whole-breast radiation treatment plans using 50 Gy in 2Gy fractions: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a field-in-field (FinF) technique, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The OEDs were calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the ``linear-exponential,{''} ``plateau,{''} and `'full mechanistic{''} dose-response models. Secondary cancer risks of the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL) were estimated and compared. Results: The lowest EARs for the CB, CL, and IL were achieved with FinF, which reduced the EARs by 77\%, 88\%. and 56\% relative to those with IMRT, and by 77\%, 84\%, and 58\% relative to those with VMAT, respectively. The secondary cancer risk for FinF was significantly lower than those of IMRT and VMAT. OED-based secondary cancer risks for CB and IL were similar when IMRT and VMAT were used, but the risk for CL was statistically lower when VMAT was used. Conclusion: The overall estimation of EAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk of breast radiation therapy was lower with FinF than with IMRT and VMAT. Therefore, when secondary cancer risk is a major concern, FinF is considered to be the preferred treatment option in irradiation of whole-breast. Advances in knowledge: Secondary malignancy estimation after breast radiotherapy is becoming an important subject for comparative treatment planning.When secondary cancer risk a major concern, FinF technique is considered the preferred treatment option in whole breast patients.