Browsing by Author "Dogan, Mutlu"
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Albumin Infusion is not Beneficial in Hypoalbuminemic End-Stage Cancer Patients: A Matched-Pair Analysis(AKAD DOKTORLAR YAYINEVI, 2012-01-01) Buyukcelik, Abdullah; Demirkazik, Ahmet; Yalcin, Bulent; Dogan, Mutlu; Kavgaci, Halil; Coban, Sahin; Icli, FikriIn this retrospective study, it was aimed whether albumin infusion is benefical or not in terminally ill hospitalized hypoalbuminemic cancer patients. Between March 2000 and 31 March 2003, the medical records of 27 terminally ill hypoalbuminemic cancer patients who had albumin infusion(Albumin receiving group-ARG), were retrospectively analysed. This grup was matched (1:1) with 27 terminally ill cancer patients who had no albumin infusion (Albumin not receiving group-ANRG), according to age, sex, ECOG PS, diagnosis and the number of metastatic sites. ARG was compared with ANRG, in regard to the changes of pulse rate, blood pressure, in the levels of serum BUN, creatinin, sodium, total protein, and albumin before albumin infusion and 48 hours after albumin infusion, and documented and/or clinical infections after albumin infusion, hospitalization duration, the rate of exitus in hospital and overall survival. There was no difference in patient characteristics between two groups. Likewise, the groups were not different from each other in terms of the changes of pulse rate, blood pressure, in the levels of serum BUN, creatinin, sodium, and documented and/or clinical infections after albumin infusion (p> 0.05). There was a significant increase in the levels of serum total protein and albumin in ARG (p< 0.05). The rate of exitus in hospital is not different between two groups. The median duration of hospitalization was longer in ANRG (p= 0.022). The overall survival was significantly better in ANRG (p= 0.018). Albumin infusion is not benefical in terminally ill hypoalbuminemic cancer patients. Furthermore, it was found that the survival was significantly worse in patients receiving albumin.Item Real life experience of patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a Turkish oncology group study(TAYLOR \& FRANCIS LTD, 2022-01-01) Basoglu, Tugba; Sakin, Abdullah; Erol, Cihan; Ozden, Ercan; cabuk, Devrim; Cilbir, Ebru; Tataroglu ozyukseler, Deniz; Ayhan, Murat; Sendur, Mehmet Ali; Dogan, Mutlu; Oksuzoglu, Berna; Eryilmaz, Melek Karakurt; Er, Ozlem; Tasci, Elif Senocak; Ozyurt, Neslihan; Dulgar, Ozgecan; Ozen, Mirac; Hacibekiroglu, Ilhan; Oner, Irem; Bekmez, Esma Turkmen; Cagri Yildirim, Hasan; Yalcin, Suayib; Paydas, Semra; Yekeduz, Emre; Aksoy, Asude; Ozcelik, Melike; Oyman, Abdilkerim; Almuradova, Elvina; Karabulut, Bulent; Demir, Nazan; Dincer, Murat; Ozdemir, Nuriye; Erdem, Dilek; Ak, Naziye; Inal, Ali; Salim, Derya Kivrak; Deniz, Gulhan Ipek; Sakalar, Teoman; Gulmez, Ahmet; Kacan, Turgut; Ozdemir, Ozlem; Alan, Ozkan; Unal, Caglar; Karakas, Yusuf; Turhal, Serdar; Yumuk, Perran FuldenNeoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) and gastric cancer (GC) was shown to improve survival in recent studies. We aimed to share our real-life experience of patients who received NACT to compare the efficacy and toxicity profile of different chemotherapy regimens in our country. This retrospective multicentre study included locally advanced GC and GEJ cancer patients who received NACT between 2007 and 2021. Relation between CT regimens and pathological evaluation were analysed. A total of 794 patients from 45 oncology centers in Turkey were included. Median age at the time of diagnosis was 60 (range: 18-86). Most frequent NACT regimens used were FLOT (65.4\%), DCF (17.4\%) and ECF (8.1\%), respectively. In the total study group, pathological complete remission (pCR) rate was 7.2\%, R0 resection rate 86.4\%, and D2 dissection rate was 66.8\%. Rate of pCR and near-CR (24\%), and R0 resection (84\%) were numerically higher in FLOT arm (p > 0.05). Patients who received FLOT had also higher chemotherapy-related toxicity rate compared to patients who received other regimens (p > 0.05). Median follow-up time was 16 months (range: 1-154 months). Estimated median overall survival (OS) was 58.4months (95\% CI: 35.2-85.7) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 50.7 months (95\% CI: 25.4-75.9). The highest 3-year estimated OS rate was also shown in FLOT arm (68\%). We still do not know which NACT regimen is the best choice for daily practice. Clinicians should tailor treatment regimens according to patients' multifactorial status and comorbidities for to obtain best outcomes. Longer follow-up period needs to validate our results.Item The Outcome of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Turkish Oncology Group Experience(AVES, 2014-01-01) Eralp, Yesim; Kilic, Leyla; Alco, Gul; Basaran, Gul; Dogan, Mutlu; Dincol, Dilek; Demirci, Senem; Icli, Fikri; Onur, Handan; Saip, Pinar; Haydaroglu, AyferObjective:Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is generally considered as a poorer prognostic subgroup, with propensity for earlier relapse and visceral involvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of non-metastatic TNBC patients from different centers in Turkey and identify clinical and pathologic variables that may effect survival. Materials and Methods:Between 1993-2007, from five different centers in Turkey, 316 nonmetastatic triple negative breast cancer patients were identified with follow-up of at least 12 months. The data was collected retrospectively from patient charts. The prognostic impact of several clinical variables were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate anayses. Results:Mean age at diagnosis was 49 years (range:24-82). The majority of the patient group had invasive ductal carcinoma (n:260, 82.3\%) and stage II disease (n:164