Browsing by Author "Hall, Matthew D."

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy With a Median Biologically Effective Dose of 100 Gy(10) for Non-bone Oligometastases
    (ELSEVIER INC, 2022-01-01) Kutuk, Tugce; Herrera, Robert; Mustafayev, Teuta Z.; Gungor, Gorkem; Ugurluer, Gamze; Atalar, Banu; Kotecha, Rupesh; Hall, Matthew D.; Rubens, Muni; Mittauer, Kathryn E.; Contreras, Jessika A.; McCulloch, James; Kalman, Noah S.; Alvarez, Diane; Romaguera, Tino; Gutierrez, Alonso N.; Garcia, Jacklyn; Kaiser, Adeel; Mehta, Minesh P.; Ozyar, Enis; Chuong, Michael D.
    Purpose: Randomized data show a survival benefit of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy in selected patients with oligometastases (OM). Stereotactic magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may facilitate the delivery of ablative dose for OM lesions, especially those adjacent to historically dose-limiting organs at risk, where conventional approaches preclude ablative dosing. Methods and Materials: The RS Search Registry was queried for OM patients (1-5 metastatic lesions) treated with SMART. Freedom from local progression (FFLP), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (LS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. FFLP was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 criteria. Results: Ninety-six patients with 108 OM lesions were treated on a 0.35 T MR Linac at 2 institutions between 2018 and 2020. SMART was delivered to mostly abdominal or pelvic lymph nodes (48.1\%), lung (18.5\%), liver and intrahepatic bile ducts (16.7\%), and adrenal gland (11.1\%). The median prescribed radiation therapy dose was 48.5 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 3-15). The median biologically effective dose corrected using an alpha/beta value of 10 was 100 Gy10 (range, 48-180). No acute or late grade 3+ toxicities were observed with median 10 months (range, 3-25) follow-up. Estimated 1-year FFLP, FFDP, PFS, and OS were 92.3\%, 41.1\%, 39.3\%, and 89.6\%, respectively. Median FFDP and PFS were 8.9 months (95\% confidence interval, 5.2-12.6 months) and 7.6 months (95\% confidence interval, 4.5-10.6 months), respectively. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents the largest analysis of SMART using ablative dosing for non-bone OM. A median prescribed biologically effective dose of 100 Gy10 resulted in excellent early FFLP and no significant toxicity, likely facilitated by continuous intrafraction MR visualization, breath hold delivery, and online adaptive replanning. Additional prospective evaluation of dose-escalated SMART for OM is warranted. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The potential role of MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy in pediatric oncology: Results from a SIOPE-COG survey
    (ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD, 2021-01-01) Seravalli, Enrica; Kroon, Petra S.; Buatti, John M.; Hall, Matthew D.; Mandeville, Henry C.; Marcus, Karen J.; Onal, Cem; Ozyar, Enis; Paulino, Arnold C.; Paulsen, Frank; Saunders, Daniel; Tsang, Derek S.; Wolden, Suzanne L.; Janssens, Geert O.
    Background and purpose: Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has been successfully implemented for several routine clinical applications in adult patients. The purpose of this study is to map the potential benefit of MRgRT on toxicity reduction and outcome in pediatric patients treated with curative intent for primary and metastatic sites. Materials and methods: Between May and August 2020, a survey was distributed among SIOPE- and COG-affiliated radiotherapy departments, treating at least 25 pediatrics patients annually and being (candidate) users of a MRgRT system. The survey consisted of a table with 45 rows (clinical scenarios for primary (n = 28) and metastatic (n = 17) tumors) and 7 columns (toxicity reduction, outcome improvement, PTV margin reduction, target volume daily adaptation, online re-planning, intrafraction motion compensation and on-board functional imaging) and the option to answer by `yes/no'. Afterwards, the Dutch national radiotherapy cohort was used to estimate the percentage of pediatric treatments that may benefit from MRgRT. Results: The survey was completed by 12/17 (71\% response rate) institutions meeting the survey inclusion criteria. Responders indicated an `expected benefit' from MRgRT for toxicity/outcome in 7\% (for thoracic lymphomas and abdominal rhabdomyosarcomas)/0\% and 18\% (for mediastinal lymph nodes, lymph nodes located in the liver/splenic hilum, and liver metastases)/0\% of the considered scenarios for the primary and metastatic tumor sites, respectively, and a `possible benefit' was estimated in 64\%/46\% and 47\%/59\% of the scenarios. When translating the survey outcome into a clinical perspective a toxicity/outcome benefit, either expected or possible, was anticipated for 55\%/24\% of primary sites and 62\%/38\% of the metastatic sites. Conclusion: Although the benefit of MRgRT in pediatric radiation oncology is estimated to be modest, the potential role for reducing toxicity and improving clinical outcomes warrants further investigation. This fits best within the context of prospective studies or registration trials.