Browsing by Author "Perente, Irfan"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Comparison of success between external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy in primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Turkish cohort(KARE PUBL, 2020-01-01) Karasu, Bugra; Kiray, Gulunay; Eris, Erdem; Perente, Irfan; Celebi, Ali Riza CenkOBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results and recurrence rates of external and endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) surgery in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) in Turkish Cohort. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed in all patients who underwent surgery for PANDO between January 2010 and September 2014 in a tertiary university hospital retrospectively. The patients were followed up on the first day, first month, third month and sixth month postoperatively. Lacrimal drainage system and recurrence rates were recorded. RESULTS: This study was conducted in 81 patients, 27 of whom were men (33.3\%) and 54 were women (66.7\%). The mean follow-up time was 30.1316.42 months (range 6-62 months). The mean age was 50.51 +/- 12.47 years (range 16 to 77 years). External DCR was used in 44 (66.7\%) of the cases and endonasal DCR was used in 37 (45.7\%) of the cases. Surgical results of DCR were divided into three groups based on the integrity and openness of the lacrimal drainage pathway in all PANDO patients. Operation success rates of these data revealed that 45 (55.6\%) cases were recorded as successful, 20 (24.7\%) of the cases were accepted as partially successful and 16 (19.8\%) of the cases were deemed as unsuccessful. Based on these data, surgical success rates were found in 38 (86.4\%) patients in external DCR and 27 (73\%) patients in endonasal DCR. Surgical failure rates were six (13.6\%) in external DCR and 10 (27\%) in endonasal DCR. There was no statistically significant difference between success rates and recurrences in both groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic DCR produced simple, minimally invasive and preferable results compared to external DCR in the Turkish population. Although the success of external DCR is higher and the recurrence is lower than endoscopic DCR, with the outcomes of this study, endoscopic DCR can be tried as the first choice to protect the patient from major surgery and anesthesia in PANDO.Item Incidence, risk factors and severity of retinopathy of prematurity in Turkey (TR-ROP study): a prospective, multicentre study in 69 neonatal intensive care units(BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP, 2018-01-01) Bas, Ahmet Yagmur; Demirel, Nihal; Koc, Esin; Isik, Dilek Ulubas; Hirfanoglu, Ibrahim Murat; Tunc, Turan; Sari, Fatma Nur; Karatekin, Guner; Koklu, Esad; Altunhan, Huseyin; Turgut, Hatice; Narter, Fatma; Tarakci, Nuriye; Tekgunduz, Kadir Serafettin; Ozkiraz, Servet; Aydemir, Cumhur; Ozdemir, Ahmet; Cetinkaya, Bilin; Kazanci, Ebru; Tastekin, Ayhan; Calkavur, Sebnem; Ozyurt, Banu Mutlu; Demirelli, Yasar; Asker, Huseyin Selim; Mutlu, Birgul; Uygur, Ozgun; Ozkan, Hilal; Armangil, Didem; Ozlu, Ferda; Mert, Mustafa Kurthan; Ergin, Hacer; Ozcan, Beyza; Bas, Evrim Kiray; Okulu, Emel; Acunas, Betul; Celik, Ulker; Uslu, Sait Ilker; Mutlu, Mehmet; Demir, Nihat; Eroglu, Funda; Gokmen, Zeynel; Beken, Serdar; Bayraktar, Bilge Tanyeri; Hakan, Nilay; Kucuktasci, Kazim; Orman, Aysen; Comert, Serdar; Ertugrul, Sabahattin; Ustun, Nuran; Sahin, Ozlem; Terek, Demet; Kale, Yusuf; Konak, Murat; Yurttutan, Sadik; Aydemir, Ozge; Zenciroglu, Aysegul; Sarici, Dilek; Guzoglu, Nilufer; Hamilcikan, Sahin; Gursoy, Tugba; Tuzun, Funda; Ors, Rahmi; Arslan, Selda; Akdag, Arzu; Memisoglu, Asli; Yasa, Beril; Hekimoglu, Berna; Turan, Ozden; Aylanc, Hakan; Takci, Sahin; Celik, Tolga; Sahin, Suzan; Kilic, Ilknur; Kara, Caner; Tunay, Zuhal Ozen; Celik, Gokhan; Gozen, Ibrahim; Satirtav, Gunhal; Polat, Nihat; Oral, Ayse Yesim; Tokgoz, Mine; Keles, Sadullah; Bilgin, Burak; Ugurbas, Silay Canturk; Karaca, Cagatay; Keskek, Nedime Sahinoglu; Ekinci, Dilbade Yildiz; Balci, Ozlem; Altan, Emir Volkan; Bakbak, Sevda; Ceylan, Nihan Aksu; Kimyon, Sabit; Alyamac, Gunay; Ture, Gamze; Yildiz, Meral; Calis, Feyza; Sizmaz, Selcuk; Sukgen, Emine; Cetin, Ebru Nevin; Ozcimen, Muammer; Demir, Semra Tiryaki; Atila, Huban; Ozal, Altan; Tufaner, Gokhan; Yucel, Ozlem Eski; Kola, Mehmet; Seven, Erbil; Ozdek, Sengul; Durukan, Ali Hakan; Kal, Ali; Celebi, Ali Riza Cenk; Koytak, Ibrahim Arif; Alacamli, Goksu; Esme, Arif; Catak, Onur; Perente, Irfan; Sahin, Alparslan; Akcakaya, Aylin Ardagil; Kiray, Gulunay; Nalcaci, Serhat; Aksoy, Umit; Bakbak, Berker; Comez, Aysegul; Gursoy, Huseyin; Kabatas, Emrah Utku; Petricli, Ikbal Seza; Yumusak, Mehmet Erhan; Kirgiz, Ahmet; Uludag, Gunay; Yaman, Aylin; Dadaci, Zeynep; Karatas, Ali; Celiker, Hande; Cebeci, Zafer; Esenulku, Mahmut Cenap; Akkoyun, Imren; Ersan, Ismail; Demir, Selim; Kadayifcilar, Sibel; Unsal, Ayse Ipek Akyuz; Hocaoglu, Mumin; Grp, T. R.-R.O.P. StudyBackground To evaluate the prevalence, risk factors and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in Turkey and to establish screening criteria for this condition. Methods A prospective cohort study (TR-ROP) was performed between 1 April 2016 and 30 April 2017 in 69 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Infants with a birth weight (BW)=1500 g or gestational age (GA)<= 32 weeks and those with a BW> 1500 g or GA> 32 weeks with an unstable clinical course were included in the study. Predictors for the development of ROP were determined by logistic regression analyses. Results The TR-ROP study included 6115 infants: 4964 (81\%) with a GA <= 32 weeks and 1151 (19\%) with a GA>32 weeks. Overall, 27\% had any stage of ROP and 6.7\% had severe ROP. A lower BW, smaller GA, total days on oxygen, late-onset sepsis, frequency of red blood cell transfusions and relative weight gain were identified as independent risk factors for severe ROP in infants with a BW=1500 g. Of all infants, 414 needed treatment and 395 (95.4\%) of the treated infants had a BW <= 1500 g. Sixty-six (16\%) of the treated infants did not fulfil the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity requirements for treatment. Conclusions Screening of infants with a GA <= 34 weeks or a BW<1700 g appears to be appropriate in Turkey. Monitoring standards of neonatal care and conducting quality improvement projects across the country are recommended to improve neonatal outcomes in Turkish NICUs.