Browsing by Author "Sahin, Gizem Nur"
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
- Results Per Page
- Sort Options
Item Endogenous c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) activity marks the boundary between normal and malignant granulosa cells(NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP, 2018-01-01) Bildik, Gamze; Akin, Nazli; Senbabaoglu, Filiz; Esmalian, Yashar; Sahin, Gizem Nur; Urman, Defne; Karahuseyinoglu, Sercin; Ince, Umit; Palaoglu, Erhan; Taskiran, Cagatay; Arvas, Macit; Guzel, Yilmaz; Yakin, Kayhan; Oktem, OzgurGranulosa cell tumor of the ovary (GCT) is a very rare tumor, accounting for only 2\% of all ovarian tumors. It originates from sex cords in the ovary and can be divided into adult (95\%) and juvenile (5\%) types based on histologic findings. To date, no clear etiologic process has been identified other than a missense point mutation in the FOXL2 gene. Our previous works showed that c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway plays critical role in cell cycle progression and mitosis of normal and immortalized granulosa cells and follicle growth in rodent ovaries. These findings led us to investigate the role of JNK pathway in the granulosa cell tumor of the ovary. We used two different GCT cell lines (COV434 and KGN) and fresh GCT samples of adult and juvenile types obtained from the patients during surgery. We have discovered that endogenous kinase activity of JNK is markedly enhanced in the GCT samples and cell lines, whereas it was almost undetectable in mitotic non-malignant human granulosa cells. The inhibition of JNK pathway in GCT cell lines with two different pharmacologic inhibitors (SP600125 and AS601245) or siRNA resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in in vitro cell growth, increased apoptosis and diminished estradiol and AMH productions. JNK inhibition was also associated with a decrease in the number of cells positive for mitosis marker phospho-histone H3(Ser) 10 in the asynchronous cellsItem GnRH agonist leuprolide acetate does not confer any protection against ovarian damage induced by chemotherapy and radiation in vitro(OXFORD UNIV PRESS, 2015-01-01) Bildik, Gamze; Akin, Nazli; Senbabaoglu, Filiz; Sahin, Gizem Nur; Karahuseyinoglu, Sercin; Ince, Umit; Taskiran, Cagatay; Selek, Ugur; Yakin, Kayhan; Guzel, Yilmaz; Ayhan, Cem; Alper, Ebru; Cetiner, Mustafa; Balaban, Basak; Mandel, Nil Molinas; Esen, Tarik; Iwase, Akira; Urman, Bulent; Oktem, OzgurSTUDY QUESTION: Is there any in vitro evidence for or against ovarian protection by co-administration of a GnRH agonist with chemotherapy in human? SUMMARY ANSWER: The co-administration of GnRH agonist leuprolide acetate with cytotoxic chemotherapy agents does not preserve ovarian reserve in vitro. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Randomized controlled trials of the co-administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists with adjuvant chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function have shown contradictory results. This fact, together with the lack of a proven molecular mechanism of action for ovarian protection with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) places this approach as a fertility preservation strategy under scrutiny. We therefore aimed in this study to provide in vitro evidence for or against the role of GnRHa in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced damage in human ovary. STUDY DESIGN, SETTINGS, SIZE AND DURATION: This translational research study of ex vivo and in vitro models of human ovary and granulosa cells was conducted in a university hospital between 2013 and 2015. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Ovarian cortical pieces (n = 15, age 14-37) and mitotic non-luteinized (COV434 and HGrC1) and non-mitotic luteinized human granulosa cells (HLGC) expressing GnRH receptor were used for the experiments. The samples were treated with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, paclitaxel, 5-FU, or TAC combination regimen (docetaxel, adriamycin and cyclophosphamide) with and without GnRHa leuprolide acetate for 24 h. DNA damage, apoptosis, follicle reserve, hormone markers of ovarian function and reserve (estradiol (E2), progesterone (P) and anti-mullerian hormone (AMH)) and the expression of anti-apoptotic genes (bcl-2, bcl-xL, bcl-2L2, Mcl-1, BIRC-2 and XIAP) were compared among control, chemotherapy and chemotherapy + GnRHa groups. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The greatest magnitude of cytotoxicity was observed in the samples treated with cyclophosphamide, cisplatin and TAC regimen. Exposure to these drugs resulted in DNA damage, apoptosis and massive follicle loss along with a concurrent decline in the steroidogenic activity of the samples. GnRHa co-administered with chemotherapy agents stimulated its receptors and raised intracellular cAMP levels. But it neither activated anti-apoptotic pathways nor prevented follicle loss, DNA damage and apoptosis induced by these drugs. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our findings do not conclusively rule out the possibility that GnRHa may offer protection, if any, through some other mechanisms in vivo. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: GnRH agonist treatment with chemotherapy does not prevent or ameliorate ovarian damage and follicle loss in vitro. These data can be useful when consulting a young patient who may wish to receive GnRH treatment with chemotherapy to protect her ovaries from chemotherapy-induced damage.