<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Neonatal intensive care nurses' assessment of preterm infants' pain and sedation: inter-rater reliability of the neonatal pain, agitation, and sedation scale

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

dc.identifier.issn

2296-2360

dc.identifier.doi

10.3389/fped.2025.1639511

dc.identifier.other

dc.description.volume

13

dc.description.issue

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA

DOI

10.3389/fped.2025.1639511
10.3389/fped.2025.1639511

Abstract

Background Timely and accurate assessment of pain and sedation in newborns is essential for effective management. Therefore, neonatal pain and sedation assessment remains a key global issue in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) nursing practice. This study examined the inter-rater reliability of Neonatal Pain Agitation, and Sedation Scale (N-PASS) scores among NICU patients.Methods This prospective observational study assessed agreement among 19 NICU nurses and two independent researchers who completed 190 observations from 82 preterm infants. Each evaluator rated N-PASS independently and blindly. Agreement among three raters-a nurse and two researchers-were analyzed using the intraclass correlation (ICC) and the Fleiss kappa test.Results Agreement levels varied across N-PASS subscales. The ICC and kappa values indicated moderate-to-good reliability for the pain/agitation subscale, whereas the ICC values for the sedation subscale indicated excellent or moderate reliability. Nurses assigned higher mean pain/agitation scores than researchers.Conclusions NICU nurses must improve their N-PASS assessment skills for both pain and sedation. NICU nurse managers should prioritize improving these competencies to improve pain experiences and ensure adequate sedation, given their significant impact on short- and long-term outcomes in preterm infants.

Description

Citation

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By