A Comparative Study of Multiparametric MRI Sequences in Measuring Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume

dc.contributor.authorBagcilar, Omer
dc.contributor.authorAlis, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorSeker, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorErdemli, Servet
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Umut
dc.contributor.authorKus, Aylin
dc.contributor.authorKayhan, Cavit
dc.contributor.authorSaglican, Yesim
dc.contributor.authorKural, Ali
dc.contributor.authorKaraarslan, Ercan
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:32:59Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:32:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the effectiveness of individual multiparametric prostate MRI (mpMRI) sequences-T2W, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-in assessing prostate cancer (PCa) index lesion volume using whole-mount pathology as the ground-truth
dc.description.abstractto assess the impact of an endorectal coil (ERC) on the measurements. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 72 PCa patients who underwent 3T mpMRI with (n = 39) or without (n = 33) an ERC. A pathologist drew the index lesion borders on whole-mount pathology using planimetry (whole-mount vol). A radiologist drew the borders of the index lesion on each mpMRI sequence-T2W(vol), DWIvol, ADC(vol), and DCEvol. Additionally, we calculated the maximum index lesion volume for each patient (maxMRI(vol)). The correlation and differences between mpMRI and wholemount pathology in measuring the index lesion volume and the impact of an ERC were investigated. Results: The median T2W(vol), DWIvol, ADC(vol), DCEvol, and maxMRI(vol) were 0.68 cm(3), 0.97 cm3, 0.98 cm3, 0.82 cm3, and 1.13 cm3. There were good positive correlations between whole-mount vol and mpMRI sequences. However, all mpMRI-derived volumes underestimated the median whole-mount vol volume of 1.97 cm(3) (P <= 0.001), with T2W vol having the largest volumetric underestimation while DWIvol and ADC(vol) having the smallest. The mean relative index lesion volume underestimations of maxMRI(vol) were 39.16\% +/- 32.58\% and 7.65\% +/- 51.91\% with and without an ERC (P = 0.002). Conclusion: T2W(vol), DWIvol, ADC(vol), DCEvol, and maxMRI(vol) substantially underestimate PCa index lesion volume compared with whole-mount pathology, with T2W vol having the largest volume underestimation. Additionally, using an ERC exacerbates the volume underestimation.
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.volume106
dc.identifier.doi10.5334/jbsr.2832
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/1343
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2832
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000890992500004
dc.publisherUBIQUITY PRESS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF THE BELGIAN SOCIETY OF RADIOLOGY
dc.subjectWhole-mount pathology
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imaging
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.titleA Comparative Study of Multiparametric MRI Sequences in Measuring Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections