Comparison of Pericardiocentesis in Post-Cardiac Surgery and Nonsurgical Patients with Pericardial Tamponade

dc.contributor.authorDegirmencioglu, Aleks
dc.contributor.authorKarakus, Gultekin
dc.contributor.authorZencirci, Ertugrul
dc.contributor.authorGullu, Ahmet Umit
dc.contributor.authorSenay, Sahin
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:32:24Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:32:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractIntroduction:There are several approaches for pericardiocentesis. However, there is no definite suggestion about puncture location after cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is any difference regarding puncture location during pericardiocentesis in postoperative cardiac tamponade comparing to nonsurgical cardiac tamponade. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who had undergone pericardiocentesis from August 2011 to December 2019. Patients were examined in two groups, nonsurgical and postsurgical, based on the etiology of pericardial tamponade. Clinical profiles, echocardiographic findings, and procedural outcomes were identified and compared. Results: Sixty-eight pericardiocenteses were performed in this period. The etiology of pericardial effusion was cardiac surgery in 27 cases and nonsurgical medical conditions in 41 cases. Baseline demographic variables were similar between the surgical and nonsurgical groups. Loculated effusion was more common in the postsurgical group (48.1\% vs. 4.9\%, P<0.001). Maximal fluid locations were different between the groups
dc.description.abstractright ventricular location was more common in the nonsurgical group (36.6\% vs. 11.1\%, P=0.02), while lateral location was more common in the postsurgical group (12.2\% vs. 40.7\%, P=0.007). Apical drainage was more frequently performed in the postsurgical group compared to the nonsurgical group (77.8\% vs. 53.7\%, P=0.044). Conclusion: Apical approach as a puncture location can be used more frequently than subxiphoid approach for effusions occurred after cardiac surgery compared to nonsurgical effusions. Procedural success is prominent in this group and can be the first choice of treatment.
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.pages488-492
dc.description.volume37
dc.identifier.doi10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0714
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/1052
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0714
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000880679400010
dc.publisherSOC BRASIL CIRURGIA CARDIOVASC
dc.relation.ispartofBRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
dc.subjectCardiac Tamponade
dc.subjectCardiovascular Surgical Procedures
dc.subjectPericardiocentesis
dc.subjectPunctures
dc.subjectDrainage
dc.titleComparison of Pericardiocentesis in Post-Cardiac Surgery and Nonsurgical Patients with Pericardial Tamponade
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections