Secondary cancer risk after whole-breast radiation therapy: field-in-field versus intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy

dc.contributor.authorHaciislamoglu, Emel
dc.contributor.authorCinar, Yunus
dc.contributor.authorGurcan, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorCanyilmaz, Emine
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Gorkem
dc.contributor.authorYoney, Adnan
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:35:04Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:35:04Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: In this study, we used the concept of organ-equivalent dose (OED) to evaluate the excess absolute risk (EAR) for secondary cancer in various organs after radiation treatment for breast cancer. Methods: Using CT data set of 12 patients, we generated three different whole-breast radiation treatment plans using 50 Gy in 2Gy fractions: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with a field-in-field (FinF) technique, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The OEDs were calculated from differential dose-volume histograms on the basis of the ``linear-exponential,{''} ``plateau,{''} and `'full mechanistic{''} dose-response models. Secondary cancer risks of the contralateral breast (CB), contralateral lung (CL), and ipsilateral lung (IL) were estimated and compared. Results: The lowest EARs for the CB, CL, and IL were achieved with FinF, which reduced the EARs by 77\%, 88\%. and 56\% relative to those with IMRT, and by 77\%, 84\%, and 58\% relative to those with VMAT, respectively. The secondary cancer risk for FinF was significantly lower than those of IMRT and VMAT. OED-based secondary cancer risks for CB and IL were similar when IMRT and VMAT were used, but the risk for CL was statistically lower when VMAT was used. Conclusion: The overall estimation of EAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk of breast radiation therapy was lower with FinF than with IMRT and VMAT. Therefore, when secondary cancer risk is a major concern, FinF is considered to be the preferred treatment option in irradiation of whole-breast. Advances in knowledge: Secondary malignancy estimation after breast radiotherapy is becoming an important subject for comparative treatment planning.When secondary cancer risk a major concern, FinF technique is considered the preferred treatment option in whole breast patients.
dc.description.issue1102
dc.description.volume92
dc.identifier.doi10.1259/bjr.20190317
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/1865
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20190317
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000487250000020
dc.publisherBRITISH INST RADIOLOGY
dc.relation.ispartofBRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
dc.titleSecondary cancer risk after whole-breast radiation therapy: field-in-field versus intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Secondary cancer risk after whole-breast radiation therapy field-in-field versus intensity modulated radiation therapy versus volumetric modulated arc therapy.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections