Estimation of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients with pelvic irradiation

dc.contributor.authorHaciislamoglu, Emel
dc.contributor.authorGungor, Gorkem
dc.contributor.authorAydin, Gokhan
dc.contributor.authorCanyilmaz, Emine
dc.contributor.authorGuler, Ozan Cem
dc.contributor.authorZengin, Ahmet Yasar
dc.contributor.authorYenice, Kamil Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:36:35Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:36:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to estimate the risk of secondary cancer after radiotherapy (RT) in high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC) patients with pelvic irradiation. Computed tomography data of five biopsy-proven HRPC patients were selected for this study. Two different planning target volumes (PTV(1)and PTV2) were contoured for each patient. The PTV(1)included the prostate, seminal vesicles, and pelvic lymphatics, while the PTV(2)included only the prostate and seminal vesicles. The prescribed dose was 54 Gy for the PTV(1)with a sequential boost (24 Gy for the PTV2). Intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used to generate treatment plans with 6 and 10 MV photon energies with the flattening filter (FF) or flattening filter-free (FFF) irradiation mode. The excess absolute risks (EARs) were calculated and compared for the bladder, rectum, pelvic bone, and soft tissue based on the linear-exponential, plateau, full mechanistic, and specific mechanistic sarcoma dose-response model. According to the models, all treatment plans resulted in similar risks of secondary bladder or rectal cancer and pelvic bone or soft tissue sarcoma except for the estimated risk of the bladder according to the full mechanistic model using IMRT((6MV
dc.description.abstractFF))technique compared with VMAT techniques with FFF options. The overall estimation of EAR indicated that the radiation-induced cancer risk due to RT in HRPC was lower for bladder than the rectum. EAR values ranged from 1.47 to 5.82 for bladder and 6.36 to 7.94 for rectum, depending on the dose-response models used. The absolute risks of the secondary pelvic bone and soft tissue sarcoma were small for the plans examined. We theoretically predicted the radiation-induced secondary cancer risk in HRPC patients with pelvic irradiation. Nevertheless, prospective clinical trials, with larger patient cohorts with a long-term follow-up, are needed to validate these model predictions.
dc.description.issue9
dc.description.issueSEP
dc.description.pages82-89
dc.description.volume21
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acm2.12972
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2120
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12972
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000548609400001
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS
dc.subjectflattening filter free (FFF)
dc.subjectprostate cancer
dc.subjectradiation-induced secondary cancer
dc.subjectradiotherapy (RT)
dc.subjectvolumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT)
dc.titleEstimation of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients with pelvic irradiation
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
J Applied Clin Med Phys - 2020 - Haciislamoglu - Estimation of secondary cancer risk after radiotherapy in high‐risk.pdf
Size:
939.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections