Are the Recommended Criteria for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Applicable to 12-core Prostate Biopsy Scheme? A Multicentre Study of Urooncology Association, Turkey

dc.contributor.authorCelik, Serdar
dc.contributor.authorKizilay, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorYorukoglu, Kutsal
dc.contributor.authorOzen, Haluk
dc.contributor.authorAkdogan, Bulent
dc.contributor.authorIzol, Volkan
dc.contributor.authorBayazit, Yildirim
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Guven
dc.contributor.authorSozen, Sinan
dc.contributor.authorBaltaci, Sumer
dc.contributor.authorMuezzinoglu, Talha
dc.contributor.authorNarter, Fehmi
dc.contributor.authorTurkeri, Levent
dc.contributor.authorAssoc, Urooncology
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:40:56Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:40:56Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study is to investigate the relevance of the Epstein criteria for the 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) scheme with the evaluation of clinicopathologic data recorded in the Urologic Cancer Database - Prostate (UroCaD-P), Urooncology Association, Turkey (UOAT). Materials and Methods: Patients with detailed pathological 12-core TRUS-Bx data for each biopsy core and who underwent RP due to PCa were included in this study. A total of 1167 patients from seven different centres were analysed. TRUS-Bx pathological findings were separately evaluated in the areas matching the sextant biopsy (6-core paramedian-lateral) scheme and in all 12-core biopsy areas (12-core biopsy scheme). Overall detection rates of PCa and ratios of clinically significant (sPCa) and insignificant PCa (insPCa) after RP were defined and compared between the biopsy schemes. Biopsy findings, according to the Epstein criteria, were also compared between the two schemes. A model for each biopsy scheme was created, including the Epstein criteria and additional biopsy findings using logistic regression analysis to predict clinically sPCa after RP. Results: There was a high correlation for the prediction of clinically insPCa between the two biopsy schemes in the same population. However, 7.3\% of PCa could not be diagnosed in the 6-core TRUS-Bx scheme. Also, 69.4\% of these had clinically sPCa according to the Epstein criteria in 12-core TRUS-Bx scheme and 51.8\% of these were clinically sPCa after RP. The presence of perineural invasion (PNI) in 12-core biopsy was also significant regarding predicting sPCa (p<0.001). Conclusion: The Epstein criteria in 12-core prostate biopsy provide a better prediction of clinically sPCa than the 6-core biopsy scheme. Biopsy PNI findings appeared to improve the effectiveness of 12-core prostate biopsy, in addition to the Epstein criteria.
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.issueMAR
dc.description.pages19-25
dc.description.volume20
dc.identifier.doi10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1677
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2667
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4274/uob.galenos.2020.1677
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000625432300005
dc.publisherGALENOS PUBL HOUSE
dc.relation.ispartofUROONKOLOJI BULTENI-BULLETIN OF UROONCOLOGY
dc.subjectProstate cancer
dc.subjectradical prostatectomy
dc.subjectclinically insignificant prostate cancer
dc.subjectEpstein criteria
dc.subject12-core prostate biopsy scheme
dc.titleAre the Recommended Criteria for Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer Applicable to 12-core Prostate Biopsy Scheme? A Multicentre Study of Urooncology Association, Turkey
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections