Position paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey

dc.contributor.authorSardanelli, Francesco
dc.contributor.authorAase, Hildegunn S.
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Marina
dc.contributor.authorAzavedo, Edward
dc.contributor.authorBaarslag, Henk J.
dc.contributor.authorBalleyguier, Corinne
dc.contributor.authorBaltzer, Pascal A.
dc.contributor.authorBeslagic, Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorBick, Ulrich
dc.contributor.authorBogdanovic-Stojanovic, Dragana
dc.contributor.authorBriediene, Ruta
dc.contributor.authorBrkljacic, Boris
dc.contributor.authorHerrero, Julia Camps
dc.contributor.authorColin, Catherine
dc.contributor.authorCornford, Eleanor
dc.contributor.authorDanes, Jan
dc.contributor.authorde Geer, Gerard
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Gul
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFuchsjaeger, Michael H.
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Fiona J.
dc.contributor.authorGraf, Oswald
dc.contributor.authorHargaden, Gormlaith
dc.contributor.authorHelbich, Thomas H.
dc.contributor.authorHeywang-Koebrunner, Sylvia H.
dc.contributor.authorIvanov, Valentin
dc.contributor.authorJonsson, Asbjorn
dc.contributor.authorKuhl, Christiane K.
dc.contributor.authorLisencu, Eugenia C.
dc.contributor.authorLuczynska, Elzbieta
dc.contributor.authorMann, Ritse M.
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Jose C.
dc.contributor.authorMartincich, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMortier, Margarete
dc.contributor.authorMueller-Schimpfle, Markus
dc.contributor.authorOrmandi, Katalin
dc.contributor.authorPanizza, Pietro
dc.contributor.authorPediconi, Federica
dc.contributor.authorPijnappel, Ruud M.
dc.contributor.authorPinker, Katja
dc.contributor.authorRissanen, Tarja
dc.contributor.authorRotaru, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorSaguatti, Gianni
dc.contributor.authorSella, Tamar
dc.contributor.authorSlobodnikova, Jana
dc.contributor.authorTalk, Maret
dc.contributor.authorTaourel, Patrice
dc.contributor.authorTrimboli, Rubina M.
dc.contributor.authorVejborg, Ilse
dc.contributor.authorVourtsis, Athina
dc.contributor.authorForrai, Gabor
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:43:03Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:43:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-01
dc.description.abstractEUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support mammography for population-based screening, demonstrated to reduce breast cancer (BC) mortality and treatment impact. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer, the reduction in mortality is 40 \% for women aged 50-69 years taking up the invitation while the probability of false-positive needle biopsy is < 1 \% per round and overdiagnosis is only 1-10 \% for a 20-year screening. Mortality reduction was also observed for the age groups 40-49 years and 70-74 years, although with ``limited evidence{''}. Thus, we firstly recommend biennial screening mammography for average-risk women aged 50-69 years
dc.description.abstractextension up to 73 or 75 years, biennially, is a second priority, from 40-45 to 49 years, annually, a third priority. Screening with thermography or other optical tools as alternatives to mammography is discouraged. Preference should be given to population screening programmes on a territorial basis, with double reading. Adoption of digital mammography (not film-screen or phosphor-plate computer radiography) is a priority, which also improves sensitivity in dense breasts. Radiologists qualified as screening readers should be involved in programmes. Digital breast tomosynthesis is also set to become ``routine mammography{''} in the screening setting in the next future. Dedicated pathways for high-risk women offering breast MRI according to national or international guidelines and recommendations are encouraged. aEuro cent EUSOBI and 30 national breast radiology bodies support screening mammography. aEuro cent A first priority is double-reading biennial mammography for women aged 50-69 years. aEuro cent Extension to 73-75 and from 40-45 to 49 years is also encouraged. aEuro cent Digital mammography (not film-screen or computer radiography) should be used. aEuro cent DBT is set to become ``routine mammography{''} in the screening setting in the next future.
dc.description.issue7
dc.description.issueJUL
dc.description.pages2737-2743
dc.description.volume27
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2872
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4612-z
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000403366700010
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofEUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
dc.subjectBreast cancer
dc.subjectPopulation-based screening
dc.subjectDigital mammography
dc.subjectDigital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)
dc.subjectRecall rate
dc.titlePosition paper on screening for breast cancer by the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) and 30 national breast radiology bodies from Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Lithuania, Moldova, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and Turkey
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s00330-016-4612-z.pdf
Size:
314.69 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections