A Clinical Comparison of Home-Based and Hospital-Based Exercise Programs Following Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability

dc.contributor.authorEren, Ilker
dc.contributor.authorCanbulat, Nazan
dc.contributor.authorAtalar, Ata Can
dc.contributor.authorEren, Sule Meral
dc.contributor.authorUcak, Ayla
dc.contributor.authorCerezci, Onder
dc.contributor.authorDemirhan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:35:52Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:35:52Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01
dc.description.abstractContext: Ideal rehabilitation method following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair surgery for anterior shoulder instability has not been proven yet. Although rapid or slow protocols were compared previously, home- or hospital-based protocols were not questioned before. Objective: The aim of this prospective unrandomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the clinical outcomes of home-based and hospital-based rehabilitation programs following arthroscopic Bankart repair. Design: Non-randomized controlled trial. Setting: Orthopedics and physical therapy units of a single institution. Patients: Fifty-four patients (49 males and 5 females) with an average age of 30.5 (9.1) years, who underwent arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and met the inclusion criteria, with at least 1-year follow-up were allocated into 2 groups: home-based (n = 33) and hospital-based (n = 21) groups. Interventions: Both groups received identical rehabilitation programs. Patients in the home-based group were called for follow-up every 3 weeks. Patients in the hospital-based group admitted for therapy every other day for a total of 6 to 8 weeks. Both groups were followed identically after the eighth week and the rehabilitation program continued for 6 months. Main Outcome Measures: Clinical outcomes were assessed using Disabilities of Arm Shoulder Hand, Constant, and Rowe scores. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the results in both groups. Wilcoxon test was used for determining the progress in each group. Results: Groups were age and gender matched (P= .61, P = .69). Average number of treatment sessions was 13.8 (7.3) for patients in the hospital-based group. Preoperative Disabilities of Ann Shoulder Hand (27.46 {[}11.81] vs 32.53 {[}16.42], P= .22), Constant (58.23 {[}14.23] vs 54.17 {[}10.46], P = .13), and Rowe (51.72 {[}15.36] vs 43.81 {[}19.16], P= .12) scores were similar between groups. Postoperative scores at sixth month were significantly improved in each group (P = .001, P = .001, and P = .001). No significant difference was observed between 2 groups regarding clinical scores in any time point. Conclusions: We have, therefore, concluded that a controlled home-based exercise program is as effective as hospital-based rehabilitation following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair for anterior shoulder instability.
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.issueAUG
dc.description.pages777-782
dc.description.volume29
dc.identifier.doi10.1123/jsr.2019-0114
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2019-0114
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000552141600012
dc.publisherHUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION
dc.subjectBankart repair
dc.subjectshoulder rehabilitation
dc.subjecthome-based rehabilitation
dc.subjecthospital-based rehabilitation
dc.titleA Clinical Comparison of Home-Based and Hospital-Based Exercise Programs Following Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair for Anterior Shoulder Instability
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections