Analysis of factors affecting baseline SF-36 Mental Component Summary in Adult Spinal Deformity and its impact on surgical outcomes
Yükleniyor...
Tarih
Süreli Yayın başlığı
Süreli Yayın ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
ISSN
Cilt
52
Sayı
3
Özet
Objectives: To identify the factors that affect SF-36 mental component    summary (MCS) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) at the time    of presentation, and to analyse the effect of SF-36 MCS on clinical    outcomes in surgically treated patients.    Methods: Prospectively collected data from a multicentric ASD database    was analysed for baseline parameters. Then, the same database for    surgically treated patients with a minimum of 1-year follow-up was    analysed to see the effect of baseline SF-36 MCS on treatment results. A    clinically useful SF-36 MCS was determined by ROC Curve analysis.    Results: A total of 229 patients with the baseline parameters were    analysed. A strong correlation between SF-36 MCS and SRS-22, ODI,    gender, and diagnosis were found (p < 0.05). For the second part of the    study, a total of 186 surgically treated patients were analysed. Only    for SF-36 PCS, the un-improved cohort based on minimum clinically    important differences had significantly lower mean baseline SF-36 MCS (p    < 0.001). SF-36 MCS was found to have an odds ratio of 0.914 in    improving SF-36 PCS score (unit by unit) (p < 0.001). A cut-off point of    43.97 for SF-36 MCS was found to be predictive of SF-36 PCS (AUC =    0.631
p < 0.001). Conclusions: The factors effective on the baseline SF-36 MCS in an ASD population are other HRQOL parameters such as SRS-22 and ODI as well as the baseline thoracic kyphosis and gender. This study has also demonstrated that baseline SF-36 MCS does not necessarily have any effect on the treatment results by surgery as assessed by SRS-22 or ODI. (C) 2018 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
p < 0.001). Conclusions: The factors effective on the baseline SF-36 MCS in an ASD population are other HRQOL parameters such as SRS-22 and ODI as well as the baseline thoracic kyphosis and gender. This study has also demonstrated that baseline SF-36 MCS does not necessarily have any effect on the treatment results by surgery as assessed by SRS-22 or ODI. (C) 2018 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
