Comparison of the modified polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography methods in determining LDL size

dc.contributor.authorCihan, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTsukamoto, Hideko
dc.contributor.authorSerdar, Muhittin
dc.contributor.authorErbil, M. Kemal
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:36:25Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:36:25Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives In this study, we aimed to compare modified Krauss polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis (PAGGE) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods in classification, quantification, and separation of lipoproteins and determining low-density lipoprotein (LDL) size. Methods Blood specimens were obtained from eighty-seven volunteers. We measured LDL size using the PAGGE method and HPLC method with total cholesterol (TC) and triglyceride (TG) peaks. In the PAGGE method, Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) staining was used instead of Sudan black staining, unlike the original method. The relationship between PAGGE and HPLC methods was evaluated by Pearson correlation test and Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Agreement between them was evaluated by Kappa analysis and Bland-Altman plots. Results Statistically significant correlation was found between the LDL size with PAGGE and HPLC methods under the cholesterol curve (HPLC-TC) (r=0.924, p<0.001). Similarly, there was a statistically significant correlation between PAGGE and HPLC methods under the TG curve (HPLC-TG) (r=0.910, p<0.001). In the PAGGE method, within-day precision was found as 2\% and between-day precision as 3\%. It was determined agreement between HPLC-TC vs. HPLC-TG methods and HPLC-TG vs. PAGGE methods was higher than HPLC-TC vs. PAGGE (Kappa values
dc.description.abstract0.68, 0.71, and 0.44, respectively). Conclusions The PAGGE method can be a reliable method for measuring LDL size. HPLC method under cholesterol and triglyceride peaks may be used in clinical practice interchangeably, but clinical decision limits should be different. In addition, our study demonstrated that measurement methods for LDL size could be simplified with several modifications.
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.issueJUL 1
dc.description.pages275-282
dc.description.volume47
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/tjb-2021-0298
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2095
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2021-0298
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000771136800001
dc.publisherWALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
dc.relation.ispartofTURKISH JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY-TURK BIYOKIMYA DERGISI
dc.subjectatherosclerosis
dc.subjectcoronary artery disease
dc.subjecthigh-performance liquid chromatography
dc.subjectLDL size
dc.subjectpolyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis
dc.subjectaterosklerozis
dc.subjectkoroner arter hastaligi
dc.subjectLDL boyutu
dc.subjectpoliakrilamid gradyent jel elektroforezi
dc.subjectyuksek-performansli sivi kromatografisi
dc.titleComparison of the modified polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography methods in determining LDL size
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of the modified polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography methods in determining LDL size.pdf
Size:
683.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections