Evaluation of the usability, efficacy and safety of a novel ophthalmic eye drop dispenser designed to deliver preservative-free artificial tears for the treatment of dry eye disease
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
dc.identifier.issn
2515-8414
dc.identifier.doi
10.1177/25158414261489406
dc.identifier.other
dc.description.volume
18
dc.description.issue
Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI
10.1177/25158414261489406
10.1177/25158414261489406
10.1177/25158414261489406
Abstract
Background Ocular conditions are often managed with eye drops but conventional dispensers may be difficult to use for some. Objectives A novel device has been designed to overcome limitations of traditional eye drop dispensers, and its ability to deliver artificial tears was tested. Design A single centre, prospective study of 24 patients with Dry Eye Disease (DED).Methods Regular users of artificial tears tested the novel dispenser over 4 weeks, evaluating: DED symptoms with the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5; ocular parameters including the non-invasive tear breakup time (NI-TBUT), the Schirmer I test and surface staining; and tear meniscus parameters (height, depth and area measured by AS-OCT before and after application). The patients used questionnaires to evaluate the usability and their satisfaction with the dispenser, and report any adverse reactions. Results Tear stability improved after 4 weeks using the dispenser, with a significantly higher NI-TBUT-first (6.48 +/- 3.65 s) and NI-TBUT-average (7.45 +/- 3.59 s) relative to baseline (4.52 +/- 3.18 and 5.95 +/- 3.39, respectively: p=0.001), coupled to milder ocular surface staining (0.54 +/- 0.65) relative to baseline (1.08 +/- 0.77: p=0.042). Artificial tear instillation using the dispenser significantly improved tear meniscus parameters, which persisted for >= 5 min, and the lower mean DEQ-5 score after 4 weeks (9.79 +/- 3.23) relative to baseline (11.20 +/- 3.37: p=0.006) indicated DED symptoms also improved. The patients rated the new dispenser as very easy (58%) or easy (33.3%) to use, and many felt very comfortable using it. Patients were satisfied (54.2%) or very satisfied (16.7%) with the new dispenser, 87.5% preferring it over conventional systems (p<0.001) and with a desire to continue using it. No adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion The Beat the Blink (TM) dispenser was feasible, easy to use, well tolerated, and highly accepted over 4 weeks. Clinical signs and patient-reported symptoms improved during use with preservative-free artificial tears.
