<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Evaluation of the usability, efficacy and safety of a novel ophthalmic eye drop dispenser designed to deliver preservative-free artificial tears for the treatment of dry eye disease

dc.contributor.authorOzkan, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorPujol-Marti, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorHellbardt, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorBirkhoff, Matthias
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya Turhan, Semra
dc.date.accessioned2026-11-05T11:03:27Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractBackground Ocular conditions are often managed with eye drops but conventional dispensers may be difficult to use for some. Objectives A novel device has been designed to overcome limitations of traditional eye drop dispensers, and its ability to deliver artificial tears was tested. Design A single centre, prospective study of 24 patients with Dry Eye Disease (DED).Methods Regular users of artificial tears tested the novel dispenser over 4 weeks, evaluating: DED symptoms with the Dry Eye Questionnaire 5; ocular parameters including the non-invasive tear breakup time (NI-TBUT), the Schirmer I test and surface staining; and tear meniscus parameters (height, depth and area measured by AS-OCT before and after application). The patients used questionnaires to evaluate the usability and their satisfaction with the dispenser, and report any adverse reactions. Results Tear stability improved after 4 weeks using the dispenser, with a significantly higher NI-TBUT-first (6.48 +/- 3.65 s) and NI-TBUT-average (7.45 +/- 3.59 s) relative to baseline (4.52 +/- 3.18 and 5.95 +/- 3.39, respectively: p=0.001), coupled to milder ocular surface staining (0.54 +/- 0.65) relative to baseline (1.08 +/- 0.77: p=0.042). Artificial tear instillation using the dispenser significantly improved tear meniscus parameters, which persisted for >= 5 min, and the lower mean DEQ-5 score after 4 weeks (9.79 +/- 3.23) relative to baseline (11.20 +/- 3.37: p=0.006) indicated DED symptoms also improved. The patients rated the new dispenser as very easy (58%) or easy (33.3%) to use, and many felt very comfortable using it. Patients were satisfied (54.2%) or very satisfied (16.7%) with the new dispenser, 87.5% preferring it over conventional systems (p<0.001) and with a desire to continue using it. No adverse reactions were reported. Conclusion The Beat the Blink (TM) dispenser was feasible, easy to use, well tolerated, and highly accepted over 4 weeks. Clinical signs and patient-reported symptoms improved during use with preservative-free artificial tears.
dc.description.pages2.51584142614894E+16
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was sponsored by i.com medical GmbH, who covered all the study costs and provided the eye drops used in the study. No external funding was obtained to perform this study.
dc.description.volume18
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/25158414261489406
dc.identifier.issn2515-8414
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/25158414261489406
dc.identifier.urihttps://openaccess.acibadem.edu.tr/handle/11443/11063
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001874733000001
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
dc.relation.fundingI.com medical GmbH
dc.relation.hasversion10.1177/25158414261489406
dc.relation.ispartofTHERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY
dc.subjecteye drop dispenser
dc.subject'beat the blink'
dc.subjectdry eye disease
dc.subjecttear film stability
dc.subjectartificial tears
dc.subjectDEQ5
dc.subjectINSTILLATION
dc.subjectGUIDELINES
dc.subjectMANAGEMENT
dc.subjectGLAUCOMA
dc.subjectOphthalmology
dc.titleEvaluation of the usability, efficacy and safety of a novel ophthalmic eye drop dispenser designed to deliver preservative-free artificial tears for the treatment of dry eye disease
dc.typeArticle
oaire.citation.editionEmerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI)
oaire.citation.volume18

Files

Collections