Critical appraisal and meta-analysis of biological variation estimates for kidney related analytes

dc.contributor.authorJonker, Niels
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Berna
dc.contributor.authorBoned, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorMarques-Garcia, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorRicos, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez, Virtudes
dc.contributor.authorBartlett, William
dc.contributor.authorBraga, Federica
dc.contributor.authorCarobene, Anna
dc.contributor.authorCoskun, Abdurrahman
dc.contributor.authorDiaz-Garzon, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Calle, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Lao, Elisabet
dc.contributor.authorMinchinela, Joana
dc.contributor.authorPerich, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorSimon, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorSandberg, Sverre
dc.contributor.authorAarsand, Aasne K.
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:41:33Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:41:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjectives Kidney markers are some of the most frequently used laboratory tests in patient care, and correct clinical decision making depends upon knowledge and correct application of biological variation (BV) data. The aim of this study was to review available BV data and to provide updated BV estimates for the following kidney markers in serum and plasma
dc.description.abstractalbumin, creatinine, cystatin C, chloride, potassium, sodium and urea. Content Relevant studies were identified from a historical BV database as well as by systematic literature searches. Retrieved publications were appraised by the Biological Variation Data Critical Appraisal Checklist (BIVAC). Meta-analyses of BIVAC compliant studies with similar design were performed to deliver global estimates of within-subject (CVI) and between-subject (CVG) BV estimates. Out of the 61 identified papers, three received a BIVAC grade A, four grade B, 48 grade C, five grade D grade and one was not appraised as it did not report numerical BV estimates. Most studies were identified for creatinine (n=48). BV estimates derived from the meta-analysis were in general lower than previously reported estimates for all analytes except urea. For some measurands, BV estimates may be influenced by age or states of health, but further data are required. This review provides updated global BV estimates for kidney related measurands. For all measurands except for urea, these estimates were lower than previously reported. Outlook For the measurands analyzed in this review, there are sufficient well-designed studies available to publish a trustworthy estimate of BV. However, for a number of newly appearing kidney markers no suitable data is available and additional studies are required.
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.issueMAR 28
dc.description.pages469-478
dc.description.volume60
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cclm-2020-1168
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2729
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-1168
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000764887100002
dc.publisherWALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
dc.relation.ispartofCLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE
dc.subjectalbumin
dc.subjectanalytical performance specifications
dc.subjectbiological variation
dc.subjectcreatinine
dc.subjectcystatin C
dc.subjectelectrolytes
dc.subjectkidney markers
dc.subjectmeta-analysis
dc.subjecturea
dc.titleCritical appraisal and meta-analysis of biological variation estimates for kidney related analytes
dc.typeArticle

Files

Collections