Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia
dc.contributor.author | Eralp, Ibrahim Levent | |
dc.contributor.author | Kocaoglu, Mehmet | |
dc.contributor.author | Dikmen, Goksel | |
dc.contributor.author | Azam, Mohsin E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Balci, Halil Ibrahim | |
dc.contributor.author | Bilen, F. Erkal | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-21T12:38:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-21T12:38:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-01-01 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarize our clinical results with distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion around the ankle joint. Methods: Between 1994 and 2009, 13 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 27-79 years) underwent tibial reconstruction for the treatment of infected nonunion of the distal tibia, with a mean bone loss of 4.8 cm (range: 1-7 cm). Lengthening over an intramedullary nail as a second procedure was used in 2 patients, bifocal compression and distraction technique in 5 cases, compression with Ilizarov external fixator in 5 cases, and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF, Smith \& Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) in 1 case. At final follow-up, functional and radiographic results were evaluated according to Paley's bone and functional healing criteria. Results: Mean duration of follow-up was 36 months. Mean external fixation time was 198 days, and mean external fixation index was 29 days/cm. According to Paley's bone healing criteria, there were 10 excellent, 2 good, and 1 poor result(s) | |
dc.description.abstract | additionally, according to Paley's functional healing criteria, there were 5 excellent, 6 good, and 2 fair results. There were 11 problems, 5 obstacles, and 1 sequel according to Paley's classification of complications. There was 1 persisting nonunion, which underwent revision with a retrograde intramedullary nail. Conclusion: External fixator and/or combined treatment are effective and reliable methods to treat infected nonunion of the distal tibia. Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction. | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.description.pages | 139-146 | |
dc.description.volume | 50 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0147 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11443/2398 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.15.0147 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000372181200004 | |
dc.publisher | TURKISH ASSOC ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMATOLOGY | |
dc.relation.ispartof | ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA | |
dc.subject | Distal tibia | |
dc.subject | infection | |
dc.subject | juxta-articular | |
dc.subject | nonunion | |
dc.subject | reconstruction | |
dc.title | Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia | |
dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
- Name:
- Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia.pdf
- Size:
- 281.35 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format