Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia

dc.contributor.authorAltundag, Aytug
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Duzgun
dc.contributor.authorSanli, Deniz Esin Tekcan
dc.contributor.authorCayonu, Melih
dc.contributor.authorKandemirli, Sedat Giray
dc.contributor.authorSanli, Ahmet Necati
dc.contributor.authorDuz, Ozge Arici
dc.contributor.authorSaatci, Ozlem
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T12:40:08Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T12:40:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-01-01
dc.description.abstractObjective. This study aimed to investigate the differences in olfactory cleft (OC) morphology in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) anosmia compared to control subjects and postviral anosmia related to infection other than severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Study Design. Prospective. Setting. This study comprises 91 cases, including 24 cases with anosmia due to SARS-CoV-2, 38 patients with olfactory dysfunction (OD) due to viral infection other than SARS-CoV-2, and a control group of 29 normosmic cases. Methods. All cases had paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT), and cases with OD had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dedicated to the olfactory nerve. The OC width and volumes were measured on CT, and T2-weighted signal intensity (SI), olfactory bulb volumes, and olfactory sulcus depths were assessed on MRI. Results. This study showed 3 major findings: the right and left OC widths were significantly wider in anosmic patients due to SARS-CoV-2 (group 1) or OD due to non-SARS-CoV-2 viral infection (group 2) when compared to healthy controls. OC volumes were significantly higher in group 1 or 2 than in healthy controls, and T2 SI of OC area was higher in groups 1 and 2 than in healthy controls. There was no significant difference in olfactory bulb volumes and olfactory sulcus depths on MRI among groups 1 and 2. Conclusion. In this study, patients with COVID-19 anosmia had higher OC widths and volumes compared to control subjects. In addition, there was higher T2 SI of the olfactory bulb in COVID-19 anosmia compared to control subjects, suggesting underlying inflammatory changes. There was a significant negative correlation between these morphological findings and threshold discrimination identification scores.
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.issueJUN
dc.description.pages1337-1344
dc.description.volume164
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0194599820965920
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/2583
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0194599820965920
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000656977700031
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.relation.ispartofOTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2
dc.subjectolfactory cleft
dc.subjectwidth
dc.subjectvolume
dc.subjectanosmia
dc.subjectSniffin' Sticks
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.titleOlfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID-19-Related Anosmia
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Otolaryngol --head neck surg - 2020 - Altundag - Olfactory Cleft Measurements and COVID‐19 Related Anosmia.pdf
Size:
2.57 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections