Browsing by Author "Kutuk, Tugce"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Current treatment strategies in malignant pleural mesothelioma with a treatment algorithm
    (VIA MEDICA, 2019-01-01) Sayan, Mutlay; Eren, Mehmet Fuat; Gupta, Apar; Ohri, Nisha; Kotek, Ayse; Babalioglu, Ibrahim; Kaplan, Sedenay Oskeroglu; Duran, Ozge; Or, Ozlem Derinalp; Cukurcayie, Funda; Kurtul, Neslihan; Bicakci, Beyhan Ceylaner; Kutuk, Tugce; Senyurek, Sukran; Turk, Ali; Jabbour, Salma K.; Atalar, Banu
    Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. The main therapeutic options for MPM include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy (RT). Although multimodality therapy has been reported to improve survival, not every medically operable patient is able to undergo all recommended therapy. With improvements in surgical techniques and systemic therapies, as well as advancements in RT, there has been a potential new paradigm in the management of this disease. In this review, we discuss the current literature on MPM management and propose a functional treatment algorithm.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multi-Institutional Outcomes of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Image Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy With a Median Biologically Effective Dose of 100 Gy(10) for Non-bone Oligometastases
    (ELSEVIER INC, 2022-01-01) Kutuk, Tugce; Herrera, Robert; Mustafayev, Teuta Z.; Gungor, Gorkem; Ugurluer, Gamze; Atalar, Banu; Kotecha, Rupesh; Hall, Matthew D.; Rubens, Muni; Mittauer, Kathryn E.; Contreras, Jessika A.; McCulloch, James; Kalman, Noah S.; Alvarez, Diane; Romaguera, Tino; Gutierrez, Alonso N.; Garcia, Jacklyn; Kaiser, Adeel; Mehta, Minesh P.; Ozyar, Enis; Chuong, Michael D.
    Purpose: Randomized data show a survival benefit of stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy in selected patients with oligometastases (OM). Stereotactic magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) may facilitate the delivery of ablative dose for OM lesions, especially those adjacent to historically dose-limiting organs at risk, where conventional approaches preclude ablative dosing. Methods and Materials: The RS Search Registry was queried for OM patients (1-5 metastatic lesions) treated with SMART. Freedom from local progression (FFLP), freedom from distant progression (FFDP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (LS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. FFLP was evaluated using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Toxicity was evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4 criteria. Results: Ninety-six patients with 108 OM lesions were treated on a 0.35 T MR Linac at 2 institutions between 2018 and 2020. SMART was delivered to mostly abdominal or pelvic lymph nodes (48.1\%), lung (18.5\%), liver and intrahepatic bile ducts (16.7\%), and adrenal gland (11.1\%). The median prescribed radiation therapy dose was 48.5 Gy (range, 30-60 Gy) in 5 fractions (range, 3-15). The median biologically effective dose corrected using an alpha/beta value of 10 was 100 Gy10 (range, 48-180). No acute or late grade 3+ toxicities were observed with median 10 months (range, 3-25) follow-up. Estimated 1-year FFLP, FFDP, PFS, and OS were 92.3\%, 41.1\%, 39.3\%, and 89.6\%, respectively. Median FFDP and PFS were 8.9 months (95\% confidence interval, 5.2-12.6 months) and 7.6 months (95\% confidence interval, 4.5-10.6 months), respectively. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this represents the largest analysis of SMART using ablative dosing for non-bone OM. A median prescribed biologically effective dose of 100 Gy10 resulted in excellent early FFLP and no significant toxicity, likely facilitated by continuous intrafraction MR visualization, breath hold delivery, and online adaptive replanning. Additional prospective evaluation of dose-escalated SMART for OM is warranted. (C) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The present and future opportunities of the Rare Cancer Network: an international consortium for advancement of oncologic care
    (SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD, 2015-01-01) Sio, Terence T.; Mirimanoff, Rene-Olivier; Ozyar, Enis; Belkacemi, Yazid; Miller, Robert C.; Villa, Salvador; Thariat, Juliette; Krengli, Marco; Scandolaro, Luciano; Atalar, Banu; Ugurluer, Gamze; Gutierrez Garcia, Beatriz; Ashman, Jonathan B.; Anacak, Yavuz; Onal, Cem; Arat, Mutlu; Sun, Xu Shan; Tesanovic, Dusanka; Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin; Oksuz, Didem; Dincbas, Fazilet; Sezen, Duygu; Akyurek, Serap; Kutuk, Tugce; Bolukbasi, Yasemin; Eren, Gulnihan; Paryani, Nitesh N.; Ahmed, Safia K.; Moretti, Luigi; Merrell, Kenneth W.; Chang, Kenneth; Mayeda, Mark; Arnett, Andrea L.; Habboush, Jacob Y.; Ozsahin, Mahmut; Network, Rare Canc
    To date, the Rare Cancer Network (RCN) has initiated more than 90 studies and 54 peer-reviewed publications were produced as a result. The Second International Symposium of the Rare Cancer Network recently took place in Istanbul, Turkey on April 17-18, 2015, and update was given on multiple currently ongoing projects, while also giving room for new proposals which will shape the direction of future studies for the group. This companion issue of the RCN Proceedings summarized the findings of this meeting, while also serving as a call for fresh projects and papers which will continue to energize the group and advance the oncologic science. A brief introduction to the principles, history, and vision of the RCN was also included. To review, the academic year of 2014-15 marked an enormous success for the international members of the RCN, with the generation of 8 fully published papers and more than 12 newly proposed topics. By the collective efforts of all RCN members, in the future, we look forward to the upcoming opportunities in continuing to advance the standard of chemo-and radiotherapeutic oncologic care for selected rare tumor topics. The studies of these rare cancers often do not allow the design and execution of prospectively enrolled trials