WOS
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/932
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Efficacy of Palbociclib and Endocrine Treatment in Heavily Pretreated Hormone Receptor-positive/HER2-negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Retrospective Multicenter Trial(GALENOS PUBL HOUSE, 2020-01-01) Demir, Atakan; Mandel, Nil Molinas; Paydas, Semra; Demir, Gokhan; Er, Ozlem; Turhal, Nazim Serdal; Bavbek, Sevil; Eralp, Yesim; Saip, Pinar Mualla; Guler, Emine Nilufer; Aydiner, Adnan; Uluc, Basak Oyan; Kilickap, Sadettin; Uskent, Necdet; Karadurmus, Nuri; Kaplan, Mehmet Ali; Yanmaz, Mustafa Teoman; Demir, Hacer; Alan, Ozkan; Korkmaz, Taner; Olgun, Polat; Uysal, Ozlem Sonmez; Altundag, Kadri; Gunduz, Seyda; Gunaldi, Meral; Sari, Murat; Beypinar, Ismail; Basaran, GulBackground: The synthesis of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine treatment in two series of treatment has been widely accepted as the standard for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. In spite of this, the activity of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have progressed despite receiving multiple lines of treatment is not well understood. Aims: To report the activity and safety of a CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib) in patients in whom at least three lines of treatment for ER+ metastatic breast cancer had failed. Study Design: Multicenter retrospective observational cohort study. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study, we included 43 patients who received palbociclib after at least three lines of systemic treatment for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Results: The median progression-free survival in our population was 7 months (25th-75th percentile, 4-10), and the median overall survival was 11 months (25th-75th percentile, 6-19). Although there were some adverse events, palbociclib was generally well tolerated, so dose reduction was needed for only six patients (14\%). Conclusion: The efficacy of palbociclib among heavily treated hormone receptor-positive/HER2- patients with advanced breast cancer was acceptable in terms of clinical benefit, and it was generally well tolerated among this population.Item The Outcome of Patients with Triple Negative Breast Cancer: The Turkish Oncology Group Experience(AVES, 2014-01-01) Eralp, Yesim; Kilic, Leyla; Alco, Gul; Basaran, Gul; Dogan, Mutlu; Dincol, Dilek; Demirci, Senem; Icli, Fikri; Onur, Handan; Saip, Pinar; Haydaroglu, AyferObjective:Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is generally considered as a poorer prognostic subgroup, with propensity for earlier relapse and visceral involvement. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of non-metastatic TNBC patients from different centers in Turkey and identify clinical and pathologic variables that may effect survival. Materials and Methods:Between 1993-2007, from five different centers in Turkey, 316 nonmetastatic triple negative breast cancer patients were identified with follow-up of at least 12 months. The data was collected retrospectively from patient charts. The prognostic impact of several clinical variables were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier and Cox multivariate anayses. Results:Mean age at diagnosis was 49 years (range:24-82). The majority of the patient group had invasive ductal carcinoma (n:260, 82.3\%) and stage II disease (n:164Item Turkish national consensus on breast cancer management during temporary state of emergency due to COVID-19 outbreak(TURKISH SURGICAL ASSOC, 2020-01-01) Sezer, Atakan; Cicin, Irfan; Cakmak, Guldeniz Karadeniz; Gurdal, Sibel Ozkan; Basaran, Gul; Oyan, Basak; Eralp, Yesim; Gulluoglu, Bahadir M.; Speci, Turkish Natl Breast OncologyObjective: Cancer care is excessively influenced by the COVID-19 outbreak for various reasons. One of the major concerns is the tendency for delayed surgical treatment of breast cancer patients. The outbreak has urged clinicians to find alternative treatments until surgery is deemed to be feasible and safe. Here in this paper, we report the results of a consensus procedure which aimed to provide an expert opinion-led guideline for breast cancer management during the COVID-19 outbreak in Turkey. Material and Methods: We used the Delphi method with a 9-scale Likert scale on two rounds of voting from 51 experienced surgeons and medical oncologists who had the necessary skills and experience in breast cancer management. Voting was done electronically in which a questionnaire-formatted form was used. Results: Overall, 46 statements on 28 different case scenarios were voted. In the first round, 37 statements reached a consensus as either endorsement or rejection, nine were put into voting in the second round since they did not reach the necessary decision threshold. At the end of two rounds, for 14 cases scenarios, a statement was endorsed as a recommendation for each.Thirty-two statements for the remaining 14 were rejected. Conclusion:There was a general consensus for administering neoadjuvant systemic therapy in patients with node-negative, small-size triple negative, HER2-positive and luminal A-like tumors until conditions are improved for due surgical treatment. Panelists also reached a consensus to extend the systemic treatment for patients with HER2-positive and luminal B-like tumors who had clinical complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.Item How Do Breast Cancer Patients Present Following COVID-19 Early Peak in a Breast Cancer Center in Turkey?(GALENOS YAYINCILIK, 2021-01-01) Isiklar, Aysun Dauti; Deniz, Cem; Soyder, Aykut; Guldogan, Nilgun; Yilmaz, Ebru; Basaran, GulObjective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has placed an unprecedented burden on healthcare systems and restricted resources for non-COVID patients worldwide. Treatment approaches and follow-up plans have been modified to prevent the risk of infection for patients and healthcare workers. Patients prefer to delay or cancel their treatments during the peak period of infection. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the characteristics of patients with breast cancer who were consulted at our outpatient clinic right after early COVID-19 peak in May and June 2020 and compared them with the same period in 2017 to 2019. Results: The number of patients who consulted at our outpatient medical oncology clinic declined in May and June 2020. This decline was regardless of stage and was larger in May than in June 2020. In general, the distribution of tumor subtypes {[}luminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) positive, and triple negative] was not different from 2017 to 2020. Less than half of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy following early COVID-19 peak in May and June 2020. Few patients received chemotherapy for metastatic disease, whereas many metastatic patients received endocrine therapy. None of the consulted new patients had a non-invasive disease. More patients received endocrine therapy than chemotherapy. Conclusion: The presentation patterns of patients with breast cancer after early COVID-19 peak differed from those during the same period in the last 3 years. The pandemic affected the number of new patients consulted and the way medical oncologists treat their patients.Item What Has Changed in Patients Aged 65 and over Diagnosed with Breast Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Single-Center Experience(KARGER, 2022-01-01) Soyder, Aykut; Guldogan, Nilgun; Isiklar, Aysun; Aribal, Erkin; Basaran, GulIntroduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has a worldwide negative impact on healthcare systems. This study aims to determine how the diagnosis, clinicopathological features, and treatment approaches of patients with breast cancer (BC) diagnosed at >= 65 years old were affected during the pandemic. This survey has shown that patients, especially the elderly, had to postpone their BC health problems or delay their routine controls due to the risk of COVID-19 transmission, high mortality rates due to comorbidity, and restrictions. Materials and Methods: The medical records of 153 patients with BC diagnosed at >= 65 years old before (January-December 2019Item Clinical Outcome and Characteristics of Turkish Breast Cancer Patients who had SARS-Cov-2 Infection(KARE PUBL, 2022-01-01) Isiklar, Aysun; Zengin, Rehile; Balci, Veysel; Sesin Kocagoz, Ayse; Basaran, GulOBJECTIVE COVID-19 pandemic has placed an unprecedented burden on health-care system. Patients with cancer are reported to have a higher risk of infection and a more complicated COVID-19 course. Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women in Turkey. We report clinical outcomes and characteristics of patients with COVID-19 who were on treatment for BC at our center. METHODS We reviewed medical records of BC patients who had COVID-19 between July 2020 and 2021 at our center. We recorded pathological, clinical, treatment characteristics, and the clinical outcome of COVID-19 infection. RESULTS A total 82 BC patients had COVID-19 between July 2020 and 2021. All patients were female, with a median age of 49 (43-64 years). 85\% of all patients had early and 14.6\% of them had advanced stage BC. COVID-19 had a mild clinical course in 73\%, hospitalization was required in 27\% of patients. Twenty-five patients who required hospitalization were discharged and three patients died due to COVID-19. All of the patients who died from COVID-19 had metastatic BC (p=0.002). Metastatic disease (p=0.002) and chemotherapy within 7 days of COVID-19 diagnosis (p=0.024) have been associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION Majority of BC patients with COVID-19 have a mild course, patients with risk factors that increase mortality should be followed more carefully.