WOS

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/932

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.Feedback

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparison of self versus expert-assisted feedback for cricothyroidotomy training: a randomized trial
    (BMC, 2022-01-01) Aldinc, Hasan; Gun, Cem; Yaylaci, Serpil; Senuren, Cigdem Ozkaya; Guven, Feray; Sahiner, Melike; Kayayurt, Kamil; Turkmen, Suha
    Background The self-video feedback method may have the potential to provide a low-cost alternative to physician-driven simulation-based training. This study aimed to assess the utility of two video feedback methods by comparing the improvement in performing cricothyroidotomy procedure following self video feedback (trainees review their performance by themselves) and expert-assisted video feedback (trainees review their performance while an emergency physician provides additional feedback). Methods This study was pretest-posttest and two-group designed research performed at a university simulation center with 89 final-year medical students and used a cricothyroidotomy simulation model. After seeing an educational presentation and a best practice video, trainees were randomized into two groups
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    EFFECT OF SIMULATED PATIENT USE ON LEARNING MOTIVATION AND STUDENT FEEDBACK IN PHYSIOTHERAPY AND REHABILITATION EDUCATION: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    (TURKEY ASSOC PHYSIOTHERAPISTS, 2020-01-01) Alaca, Nuray; Safran, Elif Esma; Cagri, Dilek; Feyzioglu, Ozlem
    Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the effect of simulated patient (SP) use for cervical region assessment on learning motivation and student feedback in undergraduate physiotherapy and rehabilitation (PTR) education. Methods: Sixty volunteered second grade students (46 females) participating in PTR Measurement and Evaluation course were included. Students were randomly divided into three groups: theoretical-practical (TP) course, SP interaction course and TP-SP taking both courses. Pre-post knowledge test including 10 multiple-choice questions was applied before and immediately after the lessons. Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) was applied after the lessons. Student feedback (anxiety-stress-motivation-usefulness) scores were recorded before, immediately after, and one week after the lessons. Results: The post knowledge test scores of the TP and TP-SP groups were significantly higher than the SP group (p<0.001). The pre-lesson anxiety of the SP and TP-SP groups was higher than the TP group (SP p=0,002 and TP-SP p=0,004). After the completion of the lessons, anxiety levels of the SP group were still higher than the TP group (p=0.002). Motivation level of the SP and TU group were increased after the training (p=0.001). Motivation level of the TP-SP was still higher than the TP group one week later (p=0.004). The TP-SP group's IMMS findings were statistically higher than the other groups (p=0.005). Conclusion: We suggest that cervical region assessment should be combined with the TP course and SP interaction in the learning process and that it is beneficial to use the SP interaction in PTR undergraduate education.