Araştırma Çıktıları
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Microcirculatory Response to Blood vs. Crystalloid Cardioplegia During Coronary Artery BypassGrafting With Cardiopulmonary Bypass(FRONTIERS MEDIA SA, 2022-01-01) Aykut, Gueclue; Ulugoel, Halim; Aksu, Ugur; Akin, Sakir; Karabulut, Hasan; Alhan, Cem; Toraman, Fevzi; Ince, CanBackground: Blood cardioplegia attenuates cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB)-induced systemic inflammatory response in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, which may favorably influence the microvascular system in this cohort. The aim of this study was to investigate whether blood cardioplegia would offer advantages over crystalloid cardioplegia in the preservation of microcirculation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with CPB.Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, 20 patients who received crystalloid (n = 10) or blood cardioplegia (n = 10) were analyzed. The microcirculatory measurements were obtained sublingually using incident dark-field imaging at five time points ranging from the induction of anesthesia (T-0) to discontinuation of CPB (T-5).Results: In the both crystalloid {[}crystalloid cardioplegia group (CCG)] and blood cardioplegia {[}blood cardioplegia group (BCG)] groups, perfused vessel density (PVD), total vessel density (TVD), and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV) were reduced after the beginning of CPB. The observed reduction in microcirculatory parameters during CPB was only restored in patients who received blood cardioplegia and increased to baseline levels as demonstrated by the percentage changes from T-0 to T-5 (\%Delta)(T0-T5) in all the functional microcirculatory parameters {[}\%Delta TVDT0-T5(CCG): -10.86 +/- 2.323 vs. \%Delta TVDT0-T5(BCG): 0.0804 +/- 1.107, p < 0.001Item Effects of short-term hyperoxic ventilation on lung, kidney, heart, and liver in a rat model: A biochemical evaluation(TURKISH ASSOC TRAUMA EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2021-01-01) Aksu, Ugur; Ulugol, Halim; Sungur, Mukadder Orhan; Senturk, Evren; Vardar, Kubra; Senturk, Mert; Toraman, FevziBACKGROUND: Despite studies on the adverse effects of hyperoxia, its use is still recommended by the World Health Organization. The aim of this study was to test the possible harmful effects of hyperoxia on the lung, kidney, heart, and liver in a rat mechanical ventilation model. METHODS: Male Wistar rats were randomly assigned into two groups (n=6/group): Normoxic (FiO(2): 0.3) or hyperoxic (FiO(2): 1.0) ventilation for 4 h. The injury was evaluated in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), blood, lung, liver, kidney, and heart was evaluated in terms of cell surface integrity, extracellular matrix (sialic acid, syndecan-1), osmotic stress (free hemoglobin), and redox homeostasis-lipid peroxidaation (malondialdehyde). BAL and wet/dry weight ratio were also evaluated for cellular permeability. RESULTS: Four hours of hyperoxic ventilation did not lead to significant changes in (1) sialic acid, syndecan-1, (2) malondialdehyde levels and wet/dry weight ratio in liver, kidney, heart, and lung compared to normoxic ventilation. CONCLUSION: Mechanical ventilation with hyperoxia seems to have almost similar effects compared to ventilation with normoxia. However, the long term effect of hyperoxia should be evaluated.Item Are surgical and non-operating room intervention safe in the COVID-19 pandemic? A retrospective study(CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS, 2021-01-01) Yildirim, Serap Aktas; Sarikaya, Zeynep Tugce; Ulugol, Halim; Ozata, Sanem; Aksu, Ugur; Toraman, Fevzi; Grp, C. O. V. I. D.-19 StudyLittle is known about the impact of COVID-19 on the outcomes of patients undergoing surgery and intervention. This study was conducted between 20 March and 20 May 2020 in six hospitals in Istanbul, and aimed to investigate the effects of surgery and intervention on COVID-19 disease progression, intensive care (ICU) need, mortality and virus transmission to patients and healthcare workers. Patients were examined in three groups: group I underwent emergency surgery, group II had an emergency non-operating room intervention, and group III received inpatient COVID-19 treatment but did not have surgery or undergo intervention. Mortality rates, mechanical ventilation needs and rates of admission to the ICU were compared between the three groups. During this period, patient and healthcare worker transmissions were recorded. In total, 1273 surgical, 476 non-operating room intervention patients and 1884 COVID-19 inpatients were examined. The rate of ICU requirement among patients who had surgery was nearly twice that for inpatients and intervention patients, but there was no difference in mortality between the groups. The overall mortality rates were 2.3\% in surgical patients, 3.3\% in intervention patients and 3\% in inpatients. COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction positivity among hospital workers was 2.4\%. Only 3.3\% of infected frontline healthcare workers were anaesthesiologists. No deaths occurred among infected healthcare workers. We conclude that emergency surgery and non-operating room interventions during the pandemic period do not increase postoperative mortality and can be performed with low transmission rates.