Araştırma Çıktıları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Alagozlu, Hakan

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    A New Risk-Scoring System for Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Screening by Turkish Colorectal Cancer and Polyp Study Group
    (AVES, 2022-01-01) Erdem, Levent; Akbal, Erdem; Kocak, Erdem; Tucer, Dilek; Ucbilek, Enver; Uyanikoglu, Ahmet; Dolapcioglu, Can; Erim, Emel Ahisali; Sirin, Goktug; Alkim, Huseyin; Soylu, Aliye; Doganay, Levent; Kurbuz, Ahmet Kemal; Ozdil, Kamil; Alagozlu, Hakan; Ozturk, Tuba Erurker; Sezikli, Mesut; Adali, Gupse; Coban, Mehmet; Hulagu, Saadettin; Degertekin, Halil; Atasoy, Alp; Akyuz, Filiz; Gaffarli, Ilham; Saruc, Murat; Altintas, Engin; Sezgin, Orhan; Tozun, Nurdan
    Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed types of cancer worldwide. An early diagnosis and detection of colon cancer and polyp can reduce mortality and morbidity from colorectal cancer. Even though there are a variety of options in screening tests, the question remains on which test is the most effective for the early detection of colorectal cancer. In this prospective study, we aimed to develop a simple, useful, effective, and reliable scoring system to detect colon polyp and colorectal cancer. Methods: We enrolled 6508 subjects over the age of 18 from 16 centers, with colonoscopy screening. The age, smoking status, alcohol consumption, body mass index polyp incidence, polyp size, number and localization, and pathologic findings were recorded. Results: The age, male gender, obesity, smoking, and family history were found as independent risk factors for adenomatous polyp. We have developed a new scoring system which can be used for these factors. With a score of 4 or above, we found the following: sensitivity 81\%, specificity 40\%, positive predictive value 25.68\%, and negative predictive value 89.84\%, for adenomatous polyp detection
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Cytoreductive Surgery Followed by Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Morbidity and Mortality Analysis of Our Patients
    (ORTADOGU AD PRES \& PUBL CO, 2012-01-01) Karadayi, Kursat; Turan, Mustafa; Karadayi, Sule; Alagozlu, Hakan; Kilickap, Saadettin; Buyukcelik, Abdullah; Sarkis, Cihat; Yucel, Birsen; Boztosun, Abdullah; Cetin, Meral; Yilmaz, Abdulkerim; Yanik, Ali; Sen, Metin
    Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the morbidity and mortality of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) with closed abdomen technique in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies. Material and Methods: Twenty-six patients (8 with ovarian cancer, 7 peritoneal mesothelioma, 6 colorectal cancer, 3 uterine sarcoma, 1 peritoneal carcinoma and 1 with gastric cancer) underwent 27 procedures. Peritonectomy was performed with complete removal of all the involved visceral and parietal peritoneum. HIPEC was performed with the closed abdominal technique using preheated (42.5 degrees C) perfusate for 60 minutes. EPIC was continued for postoperative 5 days. Results: All patients underwent resection of the lesions. Total pentonectomy was performed in 12 patients, while subtotal or partial peritonectomy was carried out in 14 according to the spread of carcinomatosis. Completeness of cytoreduction score of our patients was 0 in 18 patients, 1 in 6 patients and 2 in 2 patients. Major morbidity developed in 7 patients (27\%). CRS+HIPEC+EPIC yielded acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Of the 26 patients, 20 (77\%) were alive without evidence of disease with a mean follow-up period of 13 6 months. Overall 1 year survival was 60\%. Conclusion: Cytoreductive approach combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy prolongs survival in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) with acceptable morbidity and mortality.