Araştırma Çıktıları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    The Impact of Everolimus and Radiation Therapy on Pulmonary Fibrosis
    (MDPI, 2020-01-01) Eren, Mehmet Fuat; Eren, Ayfer Ay; Sayan, Mutlay; Yucel, Birsen; Elagoz, Sahende; Ozguven, Yildiray; Vergalasova, Irina; Altun, Ahmet; Kilickap, Saadettin; Daliparty, Vasudev Malik; Bese, Nuran
    Background and objectives:Everolimus (EVE) is a mammalian target of the rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor that is widely used in cancer patients. Pulmonary toxicity, usually manifesting as interstitial pneumonitis, is a serious adverse effect of this drug. Radiation therapy, which is often administered in conjunction with chemotherapy for synergistic effects, also causes pulmonary fibrosis. In view of pulmonary damage development in these two forms of cancer treatment, we have examined the effect of EVE administration individually, in combination with radiation given in varying sequences, and its relation to the extent of pulmonary damage.Materials and Methods:We performed an experimental study in albino rats, which were randomized into five groups: (1) control group, (2) EVE alone, (3) EVE 22 h after radiation, (4) EVE 2 h after irradiation, and (5) only radiation. Sixteen weeks after thoracic irradiation, rat lung tissue samples were examined under light microscopy, and the extent of pulmonary damage was estimated. After this, we calculated median fibrosis scores in each group.Results:The highest fibrosis score was noted in Group 4. Among the five groups, the control group had a significantly lower median fibrosis score compared to the others. When the median fibrosis score of the group that received concurrent EVE with radiation therapy (RT) (Group 4) was compared with that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0022). However, no significant differences were achieved among the study groups that received EVE only or RT only, whether concurrently or sequentially (p> 0.05).Conclusion:EVE is an effective treatment option for the management of several malignancies and is often combined with other therapies, such as radiation, for a more efficient response. However, an increased risk of pulmonary fibrosis should also be anticipated when these two modalities are combined, as they both can cause pulmonary damage, especially when administered concurrently.
  • Item
    Does Lapatinib Increase Pulmonary Toxicity when Concurrently Used with Radiation Therapy? An Experimental Study with Wistar-Albino Rats
    (AKAD DOKTORLAR YAYINEVI, 2018-01-01) Yetmen Dogan, Ozlem; Guzel, Elif; Coban, Ilker; Suzer, Oner; Bese, Nuran
    Lapatinib is an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has shown activity in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. There is no data regarding the side effects of combination of radiotherapy and Lapatinib. 40 female Wistar-albino rats (WAR) were divided into 4 groups
  • Item
    Temporary Implant Irradiation: Survey of Turkish Society of Radiation Oncology Breast Cancer Study Group
    (GALENOS YAYINCILIK, 2021-01-01) Kaydihan, Nuri; Alco, Gul; Senocak, Mustafa Sukru; Bese, Nuran
    Objective: To understand the clinical approach of radiation oncologists during the treatment of patients with breast reconstruction. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire survey was emailed to 105 active members of the Turkish Radiation Oncology Society, the Breast Cancer Study Group. The factors associated with radiation oncologists and their current practice was identified. Results: Fifty radiation oncologists (47.6\%) responded, and most of the responders (83\%) were physicians who treated >50 new breast cancer patients annually. The majority of the physicians worked in academic hospitals and had more than 15 years of work experience. The early reconstruction rate was noted to be low among patients with mastectomy (<10\% of the mastectomy patients) (p<0.05). Early implant irradiation with temporary tissue expander was noted to be a more common procedure. The majority of the respondents (68\%) preferred to irradiate an inflated implant (20\% total, 80\% partial). In addition, 22\% of the physicians declared that they routinely used bolus and that 60\% of them used it only for patients at a high risk of local recurrence factors. Conclusion: It can thus be concluded that variations exist between experienced radiation oncologists and others. Hypofractionation is not yet commonly practiced for patients with reconstruction in Turkey. A concrete consensus can be helpful to create a homogeneity in treatment decisions and practical applications.