Araştırma Çıktıları

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931

Browse

Author: search.filters.author.Demirkaya, AhmetSubject: search.filters.subject.video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Uniportal versus multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anatomical lung resections: a glance at a dilemma
    (TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD, 2018-01-01) Ersen, Ezel; Kilic, Burcu; Kara, Hasan Volkan; Iscan, Mehlika; Alizade, Nurlan; Demirkaya, Ahmet; Turna, Akif; Kaynak, Kamil
    Introduction: As the number of operations performed by videothoracoscopy is increasing, there is also a tendency to decrease the number of port incisions. Apart from the reduced number of surgical incisions, there are a few reports and systematic reviews that demonstrate some potential advantages of the uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, but the impact of the reduced incisions in the clinical setting still remains uncertain. Aim: To compare uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery to multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for anatomical lung resections in patients with malignant and benign lung diseases. Material and methods: From August 2010 to April 2016, a total of 102 patients with malignant and benign lung diseases underwent videothoracoscopic lobar and sublobar lung resections in our department. Comorbidities, tumor stage, tumor localization, mortality, operative time, pain visual analogue scale, length of hospital stay, perioperative blood loss, duration and amount of postoperative drainage and air leak, number of harvested lymph nodes and complication rates were analyzed. Results: No significant difference was found in the duration of chest tube drainage, pain visual analogue scale score, length of hospital stay, perioperative blood loss, amount of postoperative drainage, number of harvested lymph nodes or complication rate. There was no surgical mortality in either of the two groups. However, operative time was shorter (189 min vs. 256 min, p < 0.005) in the multiport group than in the uniportal group. Conclusions: Compared with the uniportal approach, the multiport approach is associated with a significantly shorter operative time in our study.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Comparative study of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open thymectomy for thymoma and myasthenia gravis
    (TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD, 2018-01-01) Ersen, Ezel; Kilic, Burcu; Kara, Hasan Volkan; Iscan, Mehlika; Sarbay, Ismail; Demirkaya, Ahmet; Bakan, Selim; Tutuncu, Melih; Turna, Akif; Kaynak, Kamil
    Introduction: Thymectomy is the preferred standard treatment in younger non-thymoma patients with myasthenia gravis as well as in patients with early stage thymoma. Total thymectomy by median sternotomy has been the surgical approach since resection of the thymus with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Aim: To compare the clinical outcomes of VATS thymectomy with conventional open thymectomy for neoplastic and non-neoplastic thymic diseases. Material and methods: Forty patients underwent thymectomy between October 2012 and January 2016. Fifteen patients were male and 25 patients were female. The mean age was 40.3 +/- 17.7 years. Seventeen (55\%) patients underwent VATS thymectomy and 23 (45\%) patients underwent an open procedure. We retrospectively reviewed the data of the patients and compared these two techniques. Results: The mean tumor size was 5.17 +/- 3.2 cm in the thymoma group (VATS 2.5 +/- 2.4 cm vs. open access 4.7 +/- 3.7 cm). None of the patients experienced a myasthenic crisis. Conversion to thoracotomy was required in 1 patient in the VATS group due to bleeding from the right internal mammary artery