Araştırma Çıktıları
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://hdl.handle.net/11443/931
Browse
5 results
Search Results
Item Comparison of outcomes of Holmium enucleation of the prostate for small- and moderate-sized prostates(WILEY, 2021-01-01) Yilmaz, Sercan; Yalcin, Serdar; Yilmaz, Mehmet; Acikgoz, Onur; Aybal, Halil cagri; Gazel, Eymen; Kaya, Engin; Tunc, LutfiThere is an ongoing discussion in the literature on the surgical treatment option for small prostate size benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) surgery in small (<30 ml) and moderate (30-80 ml) prostate size as accepted in European Association of Urology guideline. We retrospectively analysed our database between May 2016 and May 2019 and patients who underwent HoLEP surgery. Patients who have prostate size <80 ml were included the study. These patients were divided into two group: group 1 with prostate size <30 ml (n: 64) and group 2 with prostate size 30-80 ml (n: 101). Enucleation time (ET), morcellation time (MT), total operation time (OT), enucleation efficiency (EE), morcellation efficiency (ME), intra- and post-operative complications were analysed. While EE and Hb drop were better in favour of group 2Item Laser enucleation for prostates larger than 100 mL: Comparison of HoLEP and ThuLEP(WILEY, 2021-01-01) Kaya, Engin; Yilmaz, Sercan; Acikgoz, Onur; Aybal, Halil Cagri; Yilmaz, Mehmet; Gazel, Eymen; Yalcin, Serdar; Suarez-Ibarrola, Rodrigo; Tunc, LutfiRecently, with the advancements in laser technology, Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) have come to the fore in the surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We aimed to evaluate and compare the outcomes of HoLEP and ThuLEP in patients with >100 ml prostate volume. Patients who underwent HoLEP and ThuLEP between July 2017 and March 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups as HoLEP (Group 1, n = 121) and ThuLEP (Group 2, n = 104). Perioperative parameters, functional outcomes, continence status, intra and post-operative complications were compared between groups in the post-operative 1st and 6th month. No significant difference was found in terms of total laser energy (TLE), morcellation efficiency (ME), enucleated tissue weight (ETW), complication rates (CR) and continence status of patients between both groups (p > .05). In favour of ThuLEP group, there were statistically significant differences regarding total operation time (TOT), laser efficiency (LE), enucleation time (ET) and enucleation efficiency (EE) between groups (p <= .05). HoLEP and ThuLEP can be used safely and effectively in prostates larger than 100 ml.Item The role of laparoscopic experience on the learning curve of HoLEP surgery: A questionnaire-based study(AVES, 2020-01-01) Gazel, Eymen; Kaya, Engin; Yalcin, Serdar; Tokas, Theodoros; Yilmaz, Sercan; Aybal, Halil Cagri; Aydogan, Tahsin Batuhan; Tunc, LutfiObjective: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an established method for treating benign prostatic obstruction. Nonetheless, its steep learning curve limits its wide distribution. The purpose of the present study was to demonstrate the impact of laparoscopic experience on HoLEP learning curve by evaluating the association between learning curves of surgeons performing both laparoscopy and HOLEP surgery. Material and methods: A questionnaire was prepared to identify surgeon's experience on laparoscopy and HoLEP, as well as their learning curves. This questionnaire was then distributed via e-mail to 110 urologists who are actively involved in endourology/laparoscopy. Results: Of the 110 urologists, 80 (72.7\%) responded and completed the questionnaire. Of the 80 surgeons, 47 (58.8\%) reported that they had completed the HoLEP learning curve with <20 cases. Moreover, 33 (41.2\%) reported that they were able to complete the learning curve by performing >20 cases. Completion of the HoLEP learning curve in <20 cases was reached at 1.3\%, 13.8\%, and 43.8\% by beginner, moderate skilled, and experienced laparoscopists, respectively (p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic experience appears to be beneficial for surgeons while learning HoLEP. Highly experienced laparoscopic surgeons have a shorterHOLEP learning curve.Item Impact of metabolic syndrome on pre- and postoperative parameters in patients undergoing a HoLEP surgery(AVES, 2019-01-01) Aydogan, Tahsin Batuhan; Kaya, Engin; Gazel, Eymen; Yalcin, Serdar; Aybal, Halil Cagri; Tunc, LutfiObjective: We aimed to investigate the safety and success of the holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) surgery in patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) versus those without MS who have similar prostate sizes. Material and methods: Data from 120 patients who underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon between November 2015 and January 2018 were prospectively analyzed. Group 1 (n=40) and Group 2 (n=80) consisted of patients with and without MS, respectively. Preoperative-and postoperative third month control variables that were compared between the groups included hemoglobin (Hb) levelItem Comparison of long-term kidney functions after radical nephrectomy and simple nephrectomy(PEERJ INC, 2019-01-01) Olcucuoglu, Erkan; Tonyali, Senol; Tastemur, Sedat; Kasap, Yusuf; Sirin, Mehmet Emin; Gazel, Eymen; Olcucuoglu, Esin; Odabas, Oner; Ates, Can; Olcucu, Mahmut TahaObjective. To determine if there is a difference in proceeding to CKD between patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy (RN) and simple nephrectomy (SN) for different indications by comparing the short- and long-term renal function. Materials and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed the records of all patients who underwent nephrectomy (either for malign or benign indications) in our clinic between January 2007 and September 2017. The patients were divided into 2 groups according the type of surgery: 1) Radical nephrectomy Group, 2) Simple Nephrectomy Group. Renal function was evaluated with Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) calculated using the MDRD formula. Results. A total of 276 patients were included in the study. There were 202 patients in RN Group and 74 patients in SN Group. The mean age of the patients in RN Group and SN Group were age 59,2 +/- 11,5 and 49,9 +/- 15,1 years, respectively (p = 0.001). GFR levels of patients in RN Group versus SN Group were as follows: Preoperative period: 84.9 vs. 81 mL/min/1.73 m(2)